Assad's inner circle trying to covertly defect to rebels

chiro

Since when is the truth anything but?

By peoples deeds shall you know them: there is no logical fallacy to the actions especially those that have been documented on a medium like video of any individual or group. Call a spade a spade, your government along with many others committed atrocities and attempt to convey the message that 'war is peace'.

Aside from the topic of the thread concerning Syria, this is a point of concern and is highly relevant when it comes to the discussion of force especially in the context of one at the level of a nation state.

There is no logical fallacy to truth, and the facts are that nation states commit atrocities often in the guise of 'peace' to stop 'blood-shed' and 'war'. There is no logical fallacy to what has and is happening right now.

Its disgusting how the language has been so perverted to be completely devoid of meaning and how things are defined the way people want them to be rather than what they really are.

russ_watters

You need to learn how logic works. A fact may or may not be relevant to a line of discussion and ones that are not relevant should be left out.

Regardless, this isn't the place to discuss this. Please read our faq on logic and start a thread if you don't understand something.

dijkarte

With your superficial information about the subject, apparently you're mislead by your only source of information the least corrupt media.

Do more unbiased research, you get Google!

lisab

What criteria do you use to distinguish biased from unbiased research?

dijkarte

Simple. I can ask a question and they either avoid it, or they try justify their answer.

russ_watters

You ask sources questions -- you are in direct contact with them? Who are your sources? And don't tell me to google myself for your sources. This game is wearing thin. If you have better sources for information, share them, don't just make assertions about them (and ours).

rootX

It's making me bit wary who is supporting terrorism in Syria. Rebels by themselves shouldn't be able to put up so much resistance. I have to wonder why state still hasn't suppressed the rebellion.

As for biased or unbiased information, nothing coming out of Syria is verified. BBC has asserted this countless times that because of journalists restriction in Syria, it is hard to see how true are the claims made by both sides.

dijkarte

Correct me if I'm wrong but this war has been for long and they are still fighting, no winner. However, the reported killings by the media is from only one side. So the rebels got some kind of very advanced technology that make them fight and stay in the ground without killing. Oh wait, they did some terrorist bombing targeting government, streets and the police. Oh wait, the gov did that? How moronic...

russ_watters

You are just trolling now: no one has suggested the opposition hasn't killed anyone.

Please respond to my previous question about your sources/information.

dijkarte

It's hard for you to understand if you are not from there. End of story.

lisab

I'd categorize that as a very weak argument .

russ_watters

No, you said you have sources that are available on the internet. Provide them!

Dotini

Here are links to mainstream press reports, not at all hard to find, which tend to substantiate significant fractions of what is vouchsafed in those alternative media articles (which were rather sternly demanded from a reluctant dijkarte by his interlocutor).

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...,6946873.story

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/25/wo...c=me&ref=world

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/...G5W_story.html

Respectfully submitted,
Steve

Dotini

The pot is now set to boil: http://www.timesofisrael.com/turkey-...kurdish-syria/
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/07/2...of-syrias.html

Turkey has just now mobilized tanks, troops and missiles against an unacceptable breakaway Kurdish region that has declared autonomy from Damascus. International war to follow?

Meanwhile, Alawites are retreating to Latakia. It seems soon the bulk of Syria will be in the hands of the Sunni majority, and the minority Druze, Kurds, Christians, Shia, not to mention drinkers, shavers, and Western dressed and coiffed women will be fending for themselves. Muslim versus Muslim, Arab versus Arab. This is excellent divide and conquer strategy, something Sun Tzu or Niccolo Machiavelli would be proud of.

Democracy has it's rightful and hard-won place in the modern world, but it has always been susceptible to the tyranny of the majority.

Respectfully submitted,
Steve

rootX

In recent news Annan resigned:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-19099676

Security council members are still pointing fingers and blaming each other:

rootX

If I were Syrian, as a non-Sunni, I would have preferred to live under Assad. I fear regime change will put Syria decades back. But only had Assad known that reforms are must:
http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2007/issue2/Raphaeli.pdf (20007)

Even if you read any article on Libya,Tunisia, or Egypt economic/social reforms, you would see exactly the same problem. These problems were known for more than a decade but why the Western nations also ignored them? Democracy isn't the correct solution in the short run, it will only over-complicate and delay the the economic/social reforms that these countries need IMO.

rootX

Syria and Turkey tensions were rising but now even Lebanon seems to be getting caught:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-20017397