
#1
Feb205, 09:41 AM

P: 15,325

: equals sign with a dot over it
: equals sign with a squiggle (tilde) over it Do these both mean exactly the same thing? Do they both mean 'approximately equal to'? 



#2
Feb205, 09:45 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 9,398

no
[tex]\cong[/tex] means isomorphic, certainly not approximately equal 



#4
Feb205, 10:00 AM

P: 15,325

equals signs meanings
I really appreciate this. I'm helping edit a textbook that's due in like, days, so time's acrunchy.
What about a double squiggle? Is the equals sign with a squiggle (tilde) over it not appropriate even for a grade school textbook? 



#5
Feb205, 10:11 AM

P: 509





#6
Feb205, 10:18 AM

P: 15,325

OK, what about the dot over the equal? The book seems to use that interchangeably with the double squiggle.
OK, I've got some context now: pi (equals approximately) 3.14 They use both equalwithsquiggle and doublesquiggle in the above. 



#7
Feb205, 10:21 AM

Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 2,226

If two mathematical objects are isomorphic it means (infomrally) that there is a 'structurepreserving' bijection between the two objects.The symbol is also used for 'is isomorphic to' is also used to denote a geomertic congruence.
I think the equals sign with a dot above it denotes 'is nearly equal to' The double squiggle means 'approximately equal to', this is the one you probably are after. 



#8
Feb205, 10:27 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 2,004

A professor of mine once said: "The squiggly sign is an astronomers favourite tool. They only have to get an order of magnitude anyway."




#9
Feb205, 10:30 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 9,398

There is also the symbol of a dash with a tilde over it
[tex] \simeq[/tex] that is occasionally used to mean approximately equal to. Perhaps that was the one you were describing? isomorphic means "sharing properties whilst not being actually identical". For instance the strictly positive real numbers under multiplication has the same structure as the reals under addition. If you know about exponentials and logs this is easy to show. So under the operations they are in essence the same but different. 



#10
Feb205, 10:30 AM

P: 15,325

This PDF Numbers and Mathematical Expressions in English ...
lists squiggleaboveequals as 'approximately equal to'. Geez, an extensive Google search seems to be turning up a lot of disagreement on the issue. I guess the safest is to go with one the textbook has already used, the double squiggle. 



#11
Feb205, 10:38 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 11,863

I'd advise you to use this sign [itex] \simeq [/itex]...But you're free to chose any sign,as long as U DEFINE IT,meaning that in the context there's no room for confusion...
Daniel. 



#12
Feb205, 10:46 AM

Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 2,226

I'd say use the double squiggle as it's by far the most common (though using the dash with the tilde over it won't cause confusion), as for the pther two symobls (the euals sign wth the dot and the tilde over it) using them in this context can be confusing.




#13
May305, 05:02 PM

P: 1

double squiggle means "is approximately equal to"
single squiggle means "is on the order of magnitude of" or "is on the order of" ...if i am right... 



#14
May305, 05:49 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 1,593

One use of the dot over the equal sign is to distinguish mean convergence from pointwise convergence:
If the series of functions: [tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}c_nf_n(x)[/tex] converges point wise (or uniformly) to f(x), we say: [tex]f(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}c_nf_n(x)[/tex] If the series converges in the mean to f(x), we say: [tex]f(x)\doteq\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}c_nf_n(x)[/tex] 



#15
May305, 07:14 PM

P: 179

I've always wondered, what about the equals sign with a triangle over it?



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Epistemic Perspective : Meanings ARE in the head  General Discussion  76  
Why This Equation Equals 1  General Math  11  
to oxidize and to be oxidized , the same meanings?  Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework  11  
Divided by itself equals 1?  General Math  6  
Different meanings betwen  General Discussion  4 