New Reply

Science Determines Pop Music Is Too Loud

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jul31-12, 02:13 AM   #18
 

Science Determines Pop Music Is Too Loud


Quote by Ben Niehoff View Post
Oh, if that's it, then that's nothing. It's happened on and off throughout history, it will reverse itself eventually.
I dunno. Pop doesn't come out of that tradition, and 50 years ago it wasn't so sophisticated that it can afford to get even less sophisticated.
Jul31-12, 02:53 AM   #19
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by zoobyshoe View Post
I dunno. Pop doesn't come out of that tradition, and 50 years ago it wasn't so sophisticated that it can afford to get even less sophisticated.
Right, pop comes from a tradition that started with African polyrhythms and went through spirituals, ragtime, blues, jazz, rock, motown, punk, R&B, metal, rap, etc. I don't know the detailed history of all of this, but I do know that 50's-era rock was very simple, much simpler than the jazz and blues from which it evolved. Rock subsequently expanded into something more complex by around the 70's and early 80's, after which I think we saw simplification again.

Usually the "new, edgy" styles are simpler as a rebellion against the complexity that existed at the time. Look at the beginnings of punk, for example (or of 50's rock).

I don't feel like modern pop music is driven by a rebellion against any musical tradition, though. To me it feels like we've had about two decades of "blah". I also get the impression that young people of today (my generation and the two or three after), in this country, don't feel very strongly about anything in particular, musically or politically. Where previous generations saw musical movements, today we seem to have musical complacency. It is mere entertainment, and not a "voice". There are probably several causes.
Jul31-12, 03:17 PM   #20
 
Quote by Ben Niehoff View Post
Right, pop comes from a tradition that started with African polyrhythms and went through spirituals, ragtime, blues, jazz, rock, motown, punk, R&B, metal, rap, etc. I don't know the detailed history of all of this, but I do know that 50's-era rock was very simple, much simpler than the jazz and blues from which it evolved. Rock subsequently expanded into something more complex by around the 70's and early 80's, after which I think we saw simplification again.

Usually the "new, edgy" styles are simpler as a rebellion against the complexity that existed at the time. Look at the beginnings of punk, for example (or of 50's rock).

I don't feel like modern pop music is driven by a rebellion against any musical tradition, though. To me it feels like we've had about two decades of "blah". I also get the impression that young people of today (my generation and the two or three after), in this country, don't feel very strongly about anything in particular, musically or politically. Where previous generations saw musical movements, today we seem to have musical complacency. It is mere entertainment, and not a "voice". There are probably several causes.
This sums it up well.

I still wonder what the people behind this study were up to. Seems like a lot of work for a not very important point.
Jul31-12, 03:19 PM   #21
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Those who think that young people today don't care politically aren't looking at the right young people.
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Science Determines Pop Music Is Too Loud
Thread Forum Replies
Music of Science General Discussion 19
Music vs science General Discussion 18
Loud Music and Respect General Discussion 48
Loud music will make your lungs collapse Biology 3
How does loud music and noise affect hearing? General Physics 7