Register to reply

Math guessing game.

by grey22
Tags: game, guessing, math
Share this thread:
grey22
#19
Feb20-05, 03:42 AM
P: 16
I'm patiently waiting for somebody to prove me wrong. I don't care if I'm wrong. So, go on. Go and prove me wrong.
VietDao29
#20
Feb20-05, 03:49 AM
HW Helper
VietDao29's Avatar
P: 1,421
Sorry, but I don't understand this... Why 50% = 50/50? This is just terribly wrong, isn't it??
Viet Dao,
Muzza
#21
Feb20-05, 04:16 AM
P: 696
Please define what it means for a number to "exist within a fraction".
grey22
#22
Feb20-05, 04:17 AM
P: 16
Quote Quote by VietDao29
Sorry, but I don't understand this... Why 50% = 50/50? This is just terribly wrong, isn't it??
Viet Dao,
I think 50% ~ 1.
And, 50/50 = 1

I said, initially.
"Decimal 5 = 50 percent.
50 percercent is written 50/50, fifty/fifty."

So, the ~ 1, is written as 1, or 50/50.

I then said.
"Are you closer to 50 percent or one ?"

If your closer to 50%, how can the irrational number pi, exist within a fraction ?
If your closer to 1, than to 50%, the irrational number pi, can exist within a fraction, or 1.

Or course 1 irrational number pi equals itself. Written within a fraction, where it equals 1. Or else 1/1 = 50%, > 1.
danne89
#23
Feb20-05, 04:38 AM
P: 181
If you define "exist in" as: [tex] \frac {x * \pi}{y * \pi} [/tex] Pi/Pi = 1. So the only thing that exist in the fraction is x/y...

But I agreed with you; this question is quite confusing.
Zurtex
#24
Feb20-05, 09:55 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 1,123
x% is defined as x% = x/100

And as for Pi, well:

[tex]\pi = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} 4\sum_{r=0}^n \frac{(-1)^r}{2r + 1}[/tex]

That's how you define Pi without defining it as a fraction (as it can't be defined as a fraction p/q where p and q are integers).

Edit: Made a mistake in my defintion of Pi, please note that the mistake is quoted in the post below.
grey22
#25
Feb20-05, 06:31 PM
P: 16
Quote Quote by Zurtex

[tex]\pi = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{r=0}^n \frac{(-1)^r}{2r + 1}[/tex]

That's how you define Pi without defining it as a fraction
If you cannot define the irrational number pi within a fraction, how can it be defined within a fraction ?
Or.
(O) The irrational number pi / (O) The irrational number pi

And if it cannot exist within a fraction, it cannot equal itself

Exist within which fraction ? How about quantum mechanics uncertainty principle. The irrational number pi is a fraction that equals one.
The uncertainty principle is uncertain if the irrational number pi, is as I say it is. So it's not uncertain at all. 1 certainly equals 1. Digital quantum mechanics.

I'm sorry I can't be more eloquent. But, this is the state of things presently.
God does not roll dice.
DeadWolfe
#26
Feb20-05, 06:46 PM
P: 461
See kids?

LSD isn't as cool as Hunter Thompson makes it seem.
Zurtex
#27
Feb20-05, 06:49 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 1,123
Quote Quote by grey22
If you cannot define the irrational number pi within a fraction, how can it be defined within a fraction ?
Or.
(O) The irrational number pi / (O) The irrational number pi

And if it cannot exist within a fraction, it cannot equal itself

Exist within which fraction ? How about quantum mechanics uncertainty principle. The irrational number pi is a fraction that equals one.
The uncertainty principle is uncertain if the irrational number pi, is as I say it is. So it's not uncertain at all. 1 certainly equals 1. Digital quantum mechanics.

I'm sorry I can't be more eloquent. But, this is the state of things presently.
God does not roll dice.
All numbers, x, that exist in the real set satisfy the property:

[tex]\frac{x}{1} = x[/tex]

That says nothing about whether or not they are rational.

Quantum mechanics is an application of mathematics, its laws are models which attempt to explain how particles work, not numbers.
grey22
#28
Feb20-05, 06:55 PM
P: 16
Look at this image.

The definition for "Squared", not "Cubed".
The Squared root for pi, in a definition where the irrational number pi may be = 1 or .5
Attached Thumbnails
s.JPG  
grey22
#29
Feb20-05, 07:00 PM
P: 16
Quote Quote by Zurtex
Quantum mechanics is ...
I'm not deferentialing from quantum theory, mechanics, etc... I'm just using a refference to use the uncertainty principle.

Quote Quote by Zurtex
That says nothing about whether or not they are rational.
So it may be the irrational number pi...
DeadWolfe
#30
Feb20-05, 08:30 PM
P: 461
I think this topic should be deleted.
grey22
#31
Feb20-05, 08:58 PM
P: 16
Quote Quote by DeadWolfe
I think this topic should be deleted.
I think then. I don't NEED to explain Quantum theory, mechanics, whatever it's called.

The real question is. technology, will then not need it. No. It will never need it. But, God does not roll the dice.

I'll let the likes of this character DW, i quoted. To play doctor.

I really thought u folks would like to read my ideas though, but this character DW, is acting so bad.
grey22
#32
Feb20-05, 09:08 PM
P: 16
Quote Quote by DeadWolfe
I think this topic should be deleted.
Explain your detesting this thread. Why ?
DeadWolfe
#33
Feb20-05, 09:16 PM
P: 461
Because you're posts don't even have the grammatical construct of an English sentance.

Either

a) You just learned English, in which case I apologize for ahving offended you

b) You tihnk this is funny, in which case I don't think anyone here agrees

or

c) You are not mentally rational, and are a danger to yourself and others.
Hurkyl
#34
Feb20-05, 09:34 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Hurkyl's Avatar
P: 16,100
I agree, this thread isn't making sense. You should have reported it! (And I should have paid more attention to it)


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Math Q&A Game General Math 291
Fun math game General Discussion 20
GROOVY math game General Discussion 17
Guessing the quotient of... General Math 5