Register to reply

Showing that the Virial Theorem holds

by Ed Quanta
Tags: holds, showing, theorem, virial
Share this thread:
Ed Quanta
#1
Feb9-05, 02:22 PM
P: 297
So I have already calculated correctly that the expectation of the interaction potential for hydrogenic atoms is

<nlm|V(r)|nlm>=-(uZ^2e^4)/((hbar^2)*n^2)

Note that u= mass,and V(r)=-Ze^2/r

I now have to calculate <nlm|T|nlm> where T is the kinetic energy operator, and

T=p^2/(2u) + L^2/(2ur^2)

Note that p is the radial momentum operator and L is the angular momentum operator

I know hbar^2l(l+1)=L^2 and I know (pretty sure) that <1/r^2>=e^2/(2n^3hbar^2).

However, I am unsure how to find the expectation value of the p^2/(2u) term, and don't see how <T> is going to equal <V> which the book hints at being true since <T> and <V> are said to satisfy the Virial Theorem.

Help anyone?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Guidelines for enhancing solar cells using surface plasmon polaritons
Promising ferroelectric materials suffer from unexpected electric polarizations
'Cavity protection effect' helps to conserve quantum information
Tom Mattson
#2
Feb9-05, 02:39 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Tom Mattson's Avatar
P: 5,532
Quote Quote by Ed Quanta
However, I am unsure how to find the expectation value of the p^2/(2u) term,
You can do it by brute force (that's what I call working in function space). Insert the differential operator for p into the expression for T, sandwich it between &psi;n'l'm'* and &psi;nlm, and integrate.
dextercioby
#3
Feb9-05, 02:41 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 11,915
There's a piece of genius on my behalf:

[tex] \hat{H}=\hat{T}+\hat{V} [/tex] (1)

[tex] \langle nlm|\hat{H}|nlm\rangle = E_{n} =-\frac{Z^{2}\mu e^{4}}{2\hbar^{2}(4\pi\epsilon_{0})} \frac{1}{n^{2}} [/tex] (2)

[tex] \langle nlm|\hat{V}|nlm\rangle =-\frac{Ze^{2}}{(4\pi\epsilon_{0})}\langle \frac{1}{r}\rangle _{|nlm\rangle} [/tex] (3)

Compute (3) using the average of 1/r.

Then:

[tex] \langle nlm|\hat{T}|nlm\rangle =\langle nlm|\hat{H}-\hat{V}|nlm\rangle=E_{n}+\frac{Ze^{2}}{(4\pi\epsilon_{0})}\langle \frac{1}{r}\rangle _{|nlm\rangle} [/tex] (4)

Tell where u get stuck.

Daniel.

Ed Quanta
#4
Feb9-05, 02:49 PM
P: 297
Showing that the Virial Theorem holds

My book seems to leave out the 4pi*epsilon term in the denominator for some reason. But yeah thanks, I am cool now. I was missing the expectation value for the Hamiltonian. Thanks for your genius my man.
kanato
#5
Feb9-05, 11:52 PM
P: 416
Quote Quote by Ed Quanta
My book seems to leave out the 4pi*epsilon term in the denominator for some reason. But yeah thanks, I am cool now. I was missing the expectation value for the Hamiltonian. Thanks for your genius my man.
It must use the cgs unit system.. in cgs a factor of [tex] ( 4 \pi \epsilon_0 )^{\frac{1}2} [/tex] is "absorbed" into the unit of charge, so that Coulomb's law can be written as [tex] \vec{F} = \frac{e^2}{r^2}\hat{r} [/tex]


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Universal quality of virial theorem Cosmology 1
Virial Theorem Astronomy & Astrophysics 2
Virial Theorem Advanced Physics Homework 4
The Virial theorem and Cosmology Cosmology 27
Virial Theorem Astronomy & Astrophysics 5