What Are the Correct Formulas and Units for These Physics Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IKnowGravity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formulas
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around various physics equations and their correct formulations, particularly focusing on forces between charges, centrifugal force, and the mass of light. Participants are exploring the relationships between different physical quantities and the appropriate units for these equations.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to clarify the formulas related to forces and mass, questioning the correct interpretation of variables such as radius versus diameter and the role of Planck's constant in mass calculations. Some participants question the validity of specific equations presented, particularly regarding the maximum mass of a photon and the formulation of acceleration.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's equations and spelling. There is a mix of exploratory questioning and critical evaluation of the presented formulas, but no consensus has been reached regarding the correctness of the equations or concepts discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential misunderstandings related to the definitions of physical quantities and the implications of their equations. There is mention of a computer simulation, which may impose additional constraints on the discussion.

IKnowGravity
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Explanation of what is what in the formula and the unit in which they are in.

The force between two charges.

The centrifugal force between two rotating masses.

The r * r in that equation is it the radie or the diameter? I mean the length.


The mass of light. There are two versions.

Which one is right?

mass = h Planck konstant*f frequnsy
----------------------------
c * c

The Planck konstant can be modified to be divided by 2pi.

Should it? It would seem so if compared by the maximum mass a light photon can have.

mass = h Planck konstant*f frequnsy
----------------------------
c * 2 * pi c


Aslo the formula for an accelerating charge.

Charged partickles with mass are atrakted to each other and I am going to do an computer simulation.
How musch should the accelerating xyz be incremented per time unit?

The smaller time period the smaller increment in their trajektories.

F = something.

A Acceleration = (mass1 +mass2 )*time* q1 * q2
------------------------------
distans between them


X led The acceleration is modified each interval in x and y and z led. +
or minus a ceartain element.
y led
z led

This acceleration x is then added to the x position of the partickle.
This acceleration y is then added to the y position of the partickle.
This acceleration z is then added to the z position of the partickle.

Is this right?

Have i forgotten something. Help is greatly apreciated.

Christopher. :-p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "the maximum mass a light photon can have"...?
And where did u get that:
"A Acceleration = (mass1 +mass2 )*time* q1 * q2
------------------------------
distans between them


"

It looks terribly incorrect.

Daniel.
 
.. and you spelt a whole load of stuff wrong :/.
 
Forget the spelling.It's something secundary.Looks like a mixing with German...And how does he add acceleration with distance...?

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K