- #1
- 8,252
- 2,664
http://www.princeton.edu/~globsec/publications/pdf/9_3altmann.pdf
Last edited by a moderator:
Acoustic Weapons - A Prospective Assessment
- Context: Graduate
- Thread starter Ivan Seeking
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Acoustic
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the concept of acoustic weapons, particularly their potential as non-lethal options for incapacitating opponents. Participants explore various aspects including the effects of sound on humans, technological innovations in sound propagation, and the implications of using high-amplitude sound as a weapon.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Some participants note that acoustic weapons are being researched as non-lethal options that can incapacitate without causing permanent damage, although reliable information on their specifications is limited.
- One participant introduces a concept of a 'whisper beam' that utilizes ultrasound waves to target specific individuals in a crowd, suggesting potential marketing interest.
- Another participant expresses skepticism about the need for extensive marketing for such technology, implying it would be in high demand.
- Concerns are raised about the potential dangers of ultrasound at certain frequencies, with one participant suggesting that it could be lethal at high volumes.
- There is a provocative suggestion that an acoustic cannon could be used to destroy buildings, highlighting the destructive potential of low-frequency sounds.
- One participant humorously suggests that ultra-low frequencies could incapacitate soldiers, indicating a potential tactical application of acoustic weapons.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a range of views on the applications and implications of acoustic weapons, with no clear consensus on their safety, effectiveness, or ethical considerations.
Contextual Notes
Participants acknowledge the lack of reliable information regarding the specifications and effects of acoustic weapons, which may limit the discussion's depth. The conversation also touches on speculative applications and potential dangers without resolving these uncertainties.
Who May Find This Useful
Individuals interested in military technology, non-lethal weaponry, sound engineering, and the ethical implications of emerging technologies may find this discussion relevant.
http://www.princeton.edu/~globsec/publications/pdf/9_3altmann.pdf
- #2
Tyro
- 97
- 0
Not exactly related, but what I found interesting was a recent invention which relies on the superposition of ultrasound waves (which, you may know, can be tightly focused) to produce audible sound at a target. The result is a 'whisper beam', where you can point it at a target in a crowd and only that target can hear your sound. I can already see marketing execs drooling over this...
- #3
drag
Science Advisor
- 1,097
- 1
I don't think something like that would require
lots of marketing, it'll be snatched off the shelves...
- #4
Loren Booda
- 3,115
- 4
It would probably be spread by word of mouth.
Ultrasound can be deadly at certain frequencies with high enough volume.
An acoustic cannon may be used to shake, empty, then destroy a building.
Ultra-low acoustic frequencies might make one crap their pants. What a way to stop an army in its tracks? (Watch those subwoofers!)
Ultrasound can be deadly at certain frequencies with high enough volume.
An acoustic cannon may be used to shake, empty, then destroy a building.
Ultra-low acoustic frequencies might make one crap their pants. What a way to stop an army in its tracks? (Watch those subwoofers!)
Similar threads
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 5 ·