Calculate Satellite Period of Iron Planet

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the orbital period of a satellite orbiting a hypothetical spherical planet made entirely of iron, with a focus on the relationship between density, mass, and gravitational forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using centripetal force and gravitational force laws, questioning how to express the mass of the planet in terms of its density and volume. There is curiosity about whether the answer should be expressed as a function of the planet's radius.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on using relevant equations and concepts, while others are exploring different interpretations of the problem setup. There is no explicit consensus on the approach, but productive lines of reasoning are being developed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of consistent units and the implications of using density to derive mass, as well as the potential for simplifications in the equations involved.

vaxopy
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
A hypothetical spherical planet consists entirely of iron. What is the period of a satellite that orbits this planet just above its surface?

Im stumped :/
density of iron is 7860 kg/m^3
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the tools you need: an equation relating centripetal force to tangential velocity or period, Newton's gravitational force law, and the volume of a sphere. Use these and tell us where you get stuck.
 
Hi, I'm not the original poster, but I'm just curious: are they looking for the answer as a function of the radius of the planet, r? If not, how else would it be done? You've got density, so you've got the mass of the planet expressed in terms of that, and the volume of the planet, which depends on r, an unknown. Hmm, I guess that's all they're looking for...
 
There's a trick here...I am sure that in the final equation some term proportional to the density of the planet will appear and so the problem is completely solvable...:wink:

Daniel.
 
If you know the density and the volume, you can calculate the total amount of mass. Then you could plug this into Newton's law of gravitation to find acceleration due to gravity.

Actually, it's a little simpler. Multiply the mass of the planet by the universal gravitational constant (6.67 x 10^-11 m^3 kg^-1 sec^-2). Now you have a gravitational constant for your planet. Then use the following equation based on Kepler's third law:

[tex]\tau=\sqrt{\frac{4 \pi^2 a^3}{\mu}}[/tex]
[tex]a[/tex] is your semi-major axis
[tex]\mu[/tex] is the gravitational constant for your planet

Just make sure your units are all consistent (all meters or all kilometers)
 
Well,Bob,since he/she's givent the mass density,wouldn't u find more intuitive if he/she left in that formula the ratio radius^{3}/mass...?

Daniel.
 
cepheid said:
Hi, I'm not the original poster, but I'm just curious: are they looking for the answer as a function of the radius of the planet, r? If not, how else would it be done? You've got density, so you've got the mass of the planet expressed in terms of that, and the volume of the planet, which depends on r, an unknown. Hmm, I guess that's all they're looking for...

If you set the gravitational force=centripetal force (and plug in mass of the planet and velocity in terms of R), you'll see that the R's cancel each other out.
 
dextercioby said:
Well,Bob,since he/she's givent the mass density,wouldn't u find more intuitive if he/she left in that formula the ratio radius^{3}/mass...?

Daniel.
You mean the gravitational constant times the mass? Yes, as long as he only has to do one calculation with that number. For what he probably needs this for, a single problem, that probably is best.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K