Galois theory exercises

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hedlund
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exercises Theory
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the problem of demonstrating that the field extension \(\mathbb{Q}\left( \sqrt{2},\sqrt{3},\sqrt{5} \right)\) is a simple extension over \(\mathbb{Q}\). Participants explore various approaches to this problem, including algebraic manipulations and considerations of field degrees.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests a solution to the problem without prior knowledge of Galois theory.
  • Another participant suggests that a simple extension can be represented by \(r=\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}+\sqrt{5}\) and implies this should suffice.
  • A different participant emphasizes the need to show that every element in \(\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3},\sqrt{5}]\) lies in the subfield generated by \( \mathbb{Q}[r] \), proposing a simpler case for illustration.
  • Another participant discusses the degree of the field extension, suggesting it is built on three quadratic equations, leading to a degree of 8.
  • One participant challenges the previous claim, questioning whether \(\sqrt{5}\) is already contained in the extension formed by adjoining \(\sqrt{2}\) and \(\sqrt{3}\).
  • A participant responds by stating that the vector space representation does not include \(\sqrt{5}\) and critiques the need for additional proof in this context.
  • Another participant asserts that all mathematical claims require proof, reinforcing the importance of rigor in the discussion.
  • One participant provides a detailed argument assuming \(\sqrt{5}\) can be expressed in terms of the other square roots, leading to contradictions that suggest \(\sqrt{5}\) is not contained in the earlier extension.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of proving that \(\sqrt{5}\) is not contained in the extension formed by \(\sqrt{2}\) and \(\sqrt{3}\). There is no consensus on the sufficiency of the arguments presented, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various mathematical principles, such as the degree of field extensions and the independence of square roots, but the discussion lacks a complete resolution of assumptions and dependencies related to the proofs offered.

hedlund
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I haven't studied Galois theory, just seen some exercises on it. However I would like to know how one can solve this problem:

Show explicitly that [tex]\mathbb{Q}\left( \sqrt{2},\sqrt{3},\sqrt{5} \right)[/tex] is a simple extension over [tex]\mathbb{Q}[/tex]. I don't think I will understand the solution, but I just want to see a solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess a simple extension is a single element that that extends the field to the three elements. r=[tex]\sqrt(2)+\sqrt(3)+\sqrt(5)[/tex] should do it.
 
By explicit, you must show that every elemen in Q[sqrt(2),sqrt)3),sqrt(5)] lies in the subfield generated by Q[r], where r is as above.

To see how to prove this kind of thing in general, let's try a simpler case

Q[ a,b] where a^2=2, b^2=3, say, and show this is the same as Q[c], where c=a+b.

By squaring c, 5+2abis in the field on the right, thus so is (a+b)(5+2ab) = 5a+5b+4a+6b=9a+11b.

Thus 9(a+b) - 9a-11b = -2b is in it, and so is b. Hence a is in Q[c] is too, and we are done.
 
We could also consider that the degree of the field extension [tex]Q(\sqrt2,\sqrt3,\sqrt5)[/tex] is build on three quadratic equations. And since the degree(A:C) =Degree(A:B) times degree(B:C), where B is an intermediate field, we have the degree of the field is 2x2x2=8.

Thus there exists a minimal polynominal of degree 8 that contains that field extension. We consider the 8 roots of a polynominal: [tex]r_n=\pm \sqrt(2) \pm{\sqrt3}\pm \sqrt5.[/tex]

This is a polynominal of degree 8 which splits over an extension of Q containing its roots. (And because it is symmetric-actually consists of elementary symmetric functions- its coefficients lie in Q.)

Also, it is easy to see by adding and subtracting, dividing,etc,these roots that we have the three required square roots of the earlier extension. Since the vector space over the field in either case consists of 8 elements and their constant multiples, all of which can be found in: [tex](1+\sqrt2)(1+\sqrt3)(1+\sqrt5)[/tex], both fields are the same.

P.S. Hopefully this is "explicit" enought, as in "show explicitly."
 
Last edited:
Re: "We could also consider that the degree of the field extension is build on three quadratic equations. And since the degree(A:C) =Degree(A:B) times degree(B:C), where B is an intermediate field, we have the degree of the field is 2x2x2=8."

don't you have to prove that sqrt(5) is not already contained in the extension obtaiuned say by adjoining sqrt(2) and sqrt(3)? i.e. your argument seems to show the degree of the extension divides 8.
 
mathwonk: your argument seems to show the degree of the extension divides 8.

In the case you give the vector space is such that A + Bsqrt(2)+Csqrt(3) + sqrt(6) gives the elements, which does not included sqrt(5). (I have never seen a math book that thought that required an argument, and it seems, well, messy.)

As for how I wrote it up, I was too lazy to put in a third step, but considered degree(A:C) = degree(A:B) times degree (B:C) as just a rule that could be repeated as needed.
 
Last edited:
if you are, or aspire to be, a mathematician, then everything requires proof.
 
Well, if we assume [tex]\sqrt5 = a+b\sqrt2+c\sqrt3+d\sqrt6[/tex] Then we square both sides and obtain: [tex]5=a^2+2b^2+3c^2+6d^2[/tex] and
[tex]\sqrt{2}(2ab+6cd)=0[/tex], [tex]\sqrt3(2ac+4bd)=0, \sqrt6(2ad+2bc)=0.[/tex] Because each term is linerally independent. So we have:

ab=-3cd; ac=-2bd;ad=-bc. Multiplying the first and the second and dividing out bc, we get [tex]a^2=6d^2[/tex], which is impossible since the sqrt6 is not rational.

Thus we assume b=0, then cd=0, ac=0, ad=0. Assuming c=0 is the first case, so assume d=0, then ac=0, gives a=0. Thus b=0, d=0, a=0 gives:
[tex]3c^2=5[/tex], which assumes 5/3 is a square.

Thus the remaining case b=0, [tex]c not 0, d not 0, which is false since ab=0=-3cd. <i> So that should do it.</i>[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K