160,000 Said Dying Yearly from Global Warming

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the claim that approximately 160,000 deaths annually are attributed to the side effects of global warming, including diseases like malaria and issues such as malnutrition. Participants explore the validity of these claims, the methodologies used to determine such statistics, and the broader implications of global warming on human health and the environment.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question how scientists can accurately attribute health issues like malaria to global warming, citing the complexity and variability of climate data.
  • Others argue that the focus on negative impacts of global warming overlooks potential positive effects, such as reduced cold-related deaths and lower fuel costs due to milder winters.
  • A participant expresses skepticism about alarmist views on environmental issues, referencing past predictions that did not materialize as expected.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the attribution of health impacts to global warming and the overall assessment of its effects, with some emphasizing negative consequences and others highlighting potential benefits.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects a range of assumptions about the methodologies used to assess the impacts of global warming, as well as differing perspectives on the interpretation of climate data and its implications for public health.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,664
MOSCOW - About 160,000 people die every year from side-effects of global warming ranging from malaria to malnutrition and the numbers could almost double by 2020, a group of scientists said yesterday.

http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/22420/story.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I just wonder how these scientists can determine the malaria or other burden from global warming when other scientists insists that it is only detectable from faint or complex evidence?

Climate varies by year, by decade, and by century. Nobody who focusses on the climate can say that this warm spell in southeast asia or that cold snap in europe is due to "natural causes" or to global warming. But people who want to make a political statement are not shy about attributing causes.
 
Ivan Seeking said:
http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/22420/story.htm
Wow, global warming ONLY has negative effects! And of course I’m sure that the article will once again quote the worst case scenario temperature rise of +5C during the next century.

Just like ALL environmental scare stories, people, including Ivan Seeking, concentrate SOLELY on the negative aspects of ANY effect and IGNORE the positive aspects as if they don’t exist!

For instance, global warming will DECREASE cold related deaths.
Because of the milder winters, fuel bills will be significantly REDUCED. This will have the knock on effect of REDUCING FOSSIL FUEL USAGE with all that entails.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
lol, preach it Berty.

People like Ivan are alarmists and they should be ignored. I remember in the 80's that Tony Danson (?) said something like if we do not stop polluting the oceans then they will be uninhabitable in 20 yrs. Well, we have not stopped polluting the oceans and we still have not screwed over the Earth.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 184 ·
7
Replies
184
Views
50K