Why Do Sound Waves Cancel Each Other Out?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the principles of sound wave interference, specifically destructive interference. The user calculates the time for a sound wave to travel 1.7 meters, determining it takes 0.005 seconds. They correctly identify that for destructive interference to occur, the distance must be an odd multiple of the half-wavelength, clarifying their misunderstanding regarding the frequency calculations, which could yield multiple frequencies (200Hz, 300Hz, or 400Hz) if not correctly applied.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sound wave properties, including frequency and wavelength.
  • Basic knowledge of wave interference concepts, specifically constructive and destructive interference.
  • Familiarity with the speed of sound in air (approximately 340 m/s).
  • Ability to perform calculations involving wave periods and frequencies.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of wave interference in detail, focusing on destructive interference.
  • Learn how to calculate wavelength and frequency relationships in sound waves.
  • Explore the effects of medium on sound wave propagation and speed.
  • Investigate real-world applications of sound wave interference, such as noise-canceling technology.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, acoustics researchers, audio engineers, and anyone interested in the behavior of sound waves and their applications in technology.

Spyder22
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm confused by this problem: http://myspace.homelinux.com:32123/sound.jpg
Can someone explain the solution and what's wrong with my reasoning?
It takes 1.7/340 = .005 sec for the wave to travel the 1.7m. So for the waves to cancel woudn't .005 = T * 1/2 * n (where T is the period of the wave and n is an integer)? Since T= 1/f, we have f = 100n. But then f could be 200hz, 300hz, or 400hz, so that must be wrong... :frown:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
For destructive interference, the distance must be an odd multiple of the half-wavelength. If it were an even multiple, that would be constructive interference.
 
oh wow duh that was obvious :blushing: thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
16K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K