Calculating Charge Carrier Density and Average Speed in a Copper Wire

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating charge carrier density and average speed in a copper wire, specifically addressing a problem involving a copper wire's dimensions and current flow. The original poster presents a question from a textbook regarding the estimation of free charge and the average speed of charge carriers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the number of atoms in the wire's volume and questions the correctness of their initial calculations. Participants discuss the conversion of units and the method for determining the number of free charge carriers. There is also a consideration of different methods for calculating charge carrier density.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, correcting unit conversions, and discussing various methods to find the number of free electrons in the copper wire. There is no explicit consensus on the preferred method, as different approaches are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the original poster's concern about the method expected by their teacher for exam purposes, indicating a potential discrepancy between textbook methods and classroom expectations.

Mo
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
An end of chapter question that i don't really know how to do..

Question:
A copper connecting wire has a cross-sectional area of 3mm^2 and is 30cm long. (A) Estimate the amount of free charge in this wire. (B) How long will it take for all this free charge to pass through the wire when a current of 3 A flows? (C) Hence find the average speed at which this free charge moves.


Well i know the formula i have to use is; I=naqv where

I = Current
N = Charge carrier density
Q = Charge
V = Drift velocity.

It tells me in the chapter that the atoms of copper have a diameter of 0.25 nm

I need to work out the amount of atoms in a volume of (3mm^2 x 30cm) which equals: 3mm^2 x 300mm = 900mm^3 . = 0.9 m

so now to work out the number of atoms its 0.9 / .25nm = 3.6 x 10^9
then cube that = 4.6656 x 10^28 atoms per 0.9m cubed

actually i don't think ill go further just yet, but are things looking good upto this point??

Help REALLY! appreciated

Regards,
Mo
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The volume of the wire is indeed [itex]900mm^{3}[/itex].However,you've mistaken the conversion into cubic meters...
[tex]1mm^{3}=(1mm)^{3}=(10^{-3}m)^{3}=10^{-9}m^{3}[/tex]

Redo your calculations...

Daniel.
 
Thanks for the reply.

So 900 mm cubed is actually 0.729m cubed.Is this correct?
 
Nope.I told you:
1mm cubed------------------------>10^{-9}m cubed
900mm cubed---------------------->"x" m cubed...

Find "x"...

Daniel.
 
oh lol.ok. 9 x 10^-7
 
Last edited:
Perfect,now move on to the next step:the # of free charges (electrons) in the copper wire.

Daniel.
 
Ok thanks. But how am i going to do that now then?

I have a volume.

i know the diameter of 1 copper atom. do i need to find the volume of one copper atom, and then divide the total volume by the volume of 1 copper atom, to find out how many copper atoms i have?

after that (well in the book anway) it says "assume 1 free electron per atom".

??
 
You needn't know the diameter of the copper atom...Just the density.

1atom Cu------------------------->64*1.66*10^{-27}kg
"y" atoms Cu----------------------> V_{wire} ([m^{3}])*rho_{wire}([kg/m^{3}])

Find "y"...Then the # of free electrons.

Daniel.
 
Thanks for the reply.I don't mean to sound rude, however i do not think this is what they expect me to do.

Im sure its also correct, however the method in the book (and the one i need to know for the exams) achieves this without needing to know the density.

In the example in the workbook they find the charge carrier density for 1 m.They do so why dividing this 1 m by 0.25 nm and then cubing that, then they assume 1 electron per atom.

I think it would be best if i asked my teacher cause he knows what method the exam board wants.

Thanks for all your help anyway, and sorry for wasting your time!

Regards,
Mo
 
  • #10
I don't know.It looks much more simple & fair through my method.And besides,the density of copper is much more familiar than the average atomic radius...

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
20K