Register to reply

Problem with the word (deceleration)

by magpie5
Tags: deceleration, word
Share this thread:
magpie5
#1
Jan9-13, 05:19 AM
P: 5
Hi all, i think the word deceleration is used incorrectly and can cause problems for students learning physics
For example, if i start from rest and run as fast as i can until i eventually more at a constant speed. Then my interperetation of this is that (i) i accelerate at some rate (ii) continually reduce my acceleration until, (iii) I move with an approximate constant speed.
The word decelerate implies a relatively smaller magnitude acceleration ( as in (ii) above.
Often, deceleration is used to describe a reverse acceleration without any consideration of its magnitude as in example 2.

If I start from rest, run as fast as possible to top speed and stop as quick as possible. For this situation my so called deceleration has a higher magnituded than the forward acceleration.

Am I on the right track or do I simply misunderstand the English language?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Symphony of nanoplasmonic and optical resonators produces laser-like light emission
Do we live in a 2-D hologram? New Fermilab experiment will test the nature of the universe
Duality principle is 'safe and sound': Researchers clear up apparent violation of wave-particle duality
russ_watters
#2
Jan9-13, 05:31 AM
Mentor
P: 22,294
For the first case, no, "decelerate" does not imply slower acceleration. For the second....so what? I don't see what the problem is.
Sdtootle
#3
Jan9-13, 06:28 AM
P: 17
Deceleration is in reference to an object slowing down. So, in your scenario, you would have acceleration while attempting to get to your "fastest" speed and deceleration as you attempt to stop.

Notice that I did not say positive or negative there. This is all dependent on how one labels their coordinate system.

sophiecentaur
#4
Jan9-13, 08:07 AM
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
sophiecentaur's Avatar
P: 12,157
Problem with the word (deceleration)

If you avoid using the word "decelerate" except when describing real cars in traffic situations then you will have no difficulty. Positive and negative acceleration are all you need and the Maths takes care of everything.

'Moving backwards' and 'forwards' could also give problems but we usually discuss positive and negative velocities in Physics. AND in front or behind would usually be indicated by a simple (co-ordinate) sign.
CWatters
#5
Jan9-13, 01:32 PM
P: 3,143
Quote Quote by magpie5 View Post
The word decelerate implies a relatively smaller magnitude acceleration
No. Acceleration does not imply a smaller magnitude acceleration. Any time the velocity is still increasing that's an acceleration. For deceleration you need the velocity to reduce.

Deceleration can have a very large magnitude. In fact I would argue that in every day life the magnitude of the deceleration you encounter is normally larger than acceleration.
larrybud
#6
Jan10-13, 11:28 AM
P: 23
The word is "deceleration", not "deacceleration".
magpie5
#7
Jan16-13, 08:15 PM
P: 5
Thanks for all comments. All points taken. However, I still have a problem with the English language.
Yes deceleration is a reverse acceleration for example applying the brakes in a car. Yes you decelerate.
But the word (de) _ hits me.
A.T.
#8
Jan17-13, 04:30 AM
P: 4,035
The problem is not so much the word "deceleration", which means "reduction of speed", but rather the word "acceleration", which has two different meanings:
- vectorial : any change of the velocity vector
- scalar : increase of velocity vector magnitude (speed)
That ambiguity is causing much more confusion for students.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Deceleration problem Introductory Physics Homework 6
Deceleration problem! Introductory Physics Homework 2
Deceleration problem Classical Physics 7
Please help with DECELERATION problem! Introductory Physics Homework 6
A deceleration problem Introductory Physics Homework 1