How a particle tells time (Holger Mueller et al in *Science*)

In summary: Yes, this is surprising. The FPI is a very strange mathematical tool, and it is not always clear what it is supposed to be doing.
  • #1
marcus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,775
792
Bee Hossenfelder blogged about this. Too beautiful not to share.
http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2013/01/how-particle-tells-time.html

The experiment was done at UC Berkeley

Precise measurement of Compton frequency of particle

This was published online 10 January 2013 by Science journal.
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early/2013/01/09/science.1230767

A Clock Directly Linking Time to a Particle's Mass
Shau-Yu Lan1, Pei-Chen Kuan1, Brian Estey1, Damon English1, Justin M. Brown1, Michael A. Hohensee1, Holger Müller1,2,*


1Department of Physics, 366 Le Conte Hall MS7300, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
2Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, One Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hm@berkeley.edu

ABSTRACT

Historically, time measurements have been based on oscillation frequencies in systems of particles, from the motion of celestial bodies to atomic transitions. Relativity and quantum mechanics show that even a single particle of mass m determines a Compton frequency ω0 = mc2/ ħ, where c is the speed of light and ħ is the reduced Planck constant. A clock referenced to ω0 would enable high-precision mass measurements and a fundamental definition of the second. We demonstrate such a clock using an optical frequency comb to self-reference a Ramsey-Bordé atom interferometer and synchronize an oscillator at a subharmonic of ω0. This directly demonstrates the connection between time and mass. It allows measurement of microscopic masses with 4 × 10−9 accuracy in the proposed revision to SI units. Together with the Avogadro project, it yields calibrated kilograms.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Is this the "intrinsic periodicity" idea of de Brogle suggesting that inside the particle there was a periodic process that was equivalent to a clock? Donatello Dolce has published a few papers on this topic, but I haven't seen it much discussed elsewhere:
We interpret the relativistic quantum behavior of elementary particles in terms of elementary cycles. This represents a generalization of the de Broglie hypothesis of intrinsically “periodic phenomenon”, also known as “de Broglie internal clock”. Similarly to a “particle in a box” or to a “vibrating string”, the constraint of intrinsic periodicity represents a semi-classical quantization condition, with remarkable formal correspondence to ordinary relativistic quantum mechanics. In this formalism the retarded local variations of four-momentum characterizing relativistic interactions can be equivalently expressed in terms of retarded local modulations of de Broglie space-time periodicity, revealing a geometrodynamical nature of gauge interaction.
On the intrinsically cyclic nature of space-time in elementary particles
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.1140.pdf
 
  • #3
Thank you Marcus, this is really interesting! :smile:The other day I was actually about to try to touch this issue in the thread about emergent time, but I did not feel I had thought I through enough. Very interesting, thanks again! And I think I have to read the paper bohm2 linked to as well! :smile:
 
  • #4
bohm2 said:
Is this the "intrinsic periodicity" idea of de Brogle suggesting that inside the particle there was a periodic process that was equivalent to a clock? Donatello Dolce has published a few papers on this topic,

Yes. It is exactly the same. In all his papers Dolce's ansatz is that elementary particles are reference clocks and the flow of time is "ticked" by the internal clocks of the particles, depending on their kinematics. He interprets quantum mechanics from this "periodic phenomenon".

bohm2 said:
but I haven't seen it much discussed elsewhere:

On the intrinsically cyclic nature of space-time in elementary particles
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.1140.pdf

Please discuss the idea.

:zzz:
 
Last edited:
  • #5
In the paper http://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.1140.pdf the Feynman Path Integral (FPI) is derived from the relativistic "periodic phenomena". Is this surprising?

"In a cyclic geometry, such as that associated to a “de Broglie periodic phenomenon”, there is an infinite set of possible classical paths with different winding numbers that link every given initial and final configurations. Thus there are many possible classical evolutions of a field from an initial configuration to a final configuration, which can interfere. The [classical] self-interference of a “periodic phenomenon” leads formally to the ordinary FPI"

Don't be :shy:.
 

1. How does a particle tell time?

In the study conducted by Holger Mueller et al, they found that the spin of a particle can serve as a clock or timekeeper. As the particle spins, it emits a certain frequency of electromagnetic radiation, which can be used to measure time.

2. Why is this discovery significant?

This discovery is significant because it challenges our traditional understanding of timekeeping. It also has potential applications in quantum computing and precision measurements.

3. Can particles tell time accurately?

The study showed that particles can tell time with an accuracy of 1 part in 10^18, which is incredibly precise and comparable to modern atomic clocks.

4. How is this different from traditional clocks?

Traditional clocks rely on the motion of objects, such as pendulums or gears, to keep time. This discovery shows that particles can also serve as a timekeeping mechanism, which could lead to more accurate and efficient clocks in the future.

5. What further research is needed in this area?

While this study provides valuable insights into how particles can tell time, further research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms behind this phenomenon. This could lead to new technologies and applications in the future.

Back
Top