What Is the Minimum Energy of a Photon in a Compton Collision with a Proton?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a Compton collision involving a photon and a proton at rest. The original poster seeks to determine the minimum energy of the photon given the recoil kinetic energy of the proton is 4.5 MeV and the mass of the proton is 938 MeV/c².

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of energy and momentum in the context of the collision. The original poster expresses confusion about applying energy conservation correctly. Others suggest writing equations for energy and momentum balance, questioning the assumptions made about the collision's dimensionality and the implications of the photon having no energy or momentum post-collision.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring various interpretations of the problem, with some suggesting specific equations related to photon scattering. There is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet, but guidance has been offered regarding the use of relevant equations and the need to consider scattering angles.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the problem may lack sufficient information or clarity, particularly regarding the assumptions about the collision and the relationship between photon energy and momentum.

vsage
For some reason I don't feel like I was given all of the information on this question:

A proton at rest is struck by a photon in a Compton collision. If the recoil kinetic energy of the proton is 4.5 MeV, what is the minimum energy of the incident photon (in MeV)? (Take the mass of the proton to be 938 MeV/c2.)

I applied energy conservation but it didn't seem to work. (Yes the title is misleading, I confused it with something else)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's an elastic collision.Both energy & momentum are conserved.Write the balance of energy:total energy before=total energy after.

The photon is massless.

Daniel.
 
Alright so then I have by conservation of energy: (subscript 0 = photon initial 1 = proton initial 2 = proton final 3 = photon final)

[tex]E_0 + E_1 = E_2 + E_3[/tex]
[tex]p_0c + 938 = 938 + 4.5 + p_3c[/tex]

and conservation of momentum

[tex]p_0 + p_1 = p_2 + p_3, p_1 = 0[/tex]
[tex]p_0 = p_2 + p_3[/tex]

[tex]p_2c[/tex] can be rewritten in terms of kinetic energy and the mass of a proton as [tex]p_2c = \sqrt{{KE}^2 + 2KEm_pc^2}[/tex]

and, calculating it out, I get [tex]p_2c = 92 MeV[/tex]
so now I have [tex]p_0c = 92 + p_3c[/tex]

What can I do with this? substituting in 92 doesn't make any sense really. I think I did something wrong somewhere. I did assume a 1 dimensional collision though. I could probably work something in 2 dimensions but I don't see the relevance at this point.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do you agree that
[tex]p_{0}c=4.5MeV+p_{3}c[/tex] ...?

Daniel.

P.S.What does the problem ask you...?
 
Right. The minimum energy I would have thought would have been where the photon has no momentum after collision (and therefore no energy), but [tex]p_0c = 4.5[/tex] doesn't appear to be the answer according to this computer script. This is probably such a silly question too.
 
vsage said:
The minimum energy I would have thought would have been where the photon has no momentum after collision (and therefore no energy)

Uh, if a photon has no energy and momentum, it doesn't even exist! :eek:

You also need to use the equation that relates the scattered photon energy to the scattering angle:

[tex]\frac{1}{E'} - \frac{1}{E} = \frac {1}{m_p c^2}(1 - \cos \theta)[/tex]

where E is the incoming photon energy and E' is the scattered photon energy. You've seen this equation or something like it (probably using wavelength instead of energy), right?

Your desired outcome corresponds to a particular scattering angle in the range of 0 to 180 degrees. Deduce that angle somehow, and together with the energy conservation equation, you have two equations in the two unknowns E and E'.
 
I had originally been using that formula jtbell, but i had been plugging in the proton's energies for some reason. It's good to hear confirmation though!. I'll see what I can do with it by combining that dextercioby said with that. Thanks guys!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
10K