Register to reply

Geodesic of a Sphere in spherical polar coordinates (Taylor's Classical Mechanics)

Share this thread:
fehilz
#1
Feb6-13, 06:44 PM
P: 3
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data


"The shortest path between two point on a curved surface, such as the surface of a sphere is called a geodesic. To find a geodesic, one has to first set up an integral that gives the length of a path on the surface in question. This will always be similar to the integral (6.2) but may be more complicated (depending on the nature of the surface) and may involve different coordinates than x and y. To illustrate this, use spherical polar coordinates (r, [itex]\theta[/itex],[itex]\phi[/itex] ) to show that the length of a path joining two points on a sphere of radius R is

L=R[itex]\int[/itex][itex]\sqrt{1+sin^2\theta\phi'(\theta)^2}[/itex]d[itex]\theta[/itex] (Don't know how to do it on latex but the integral is between [itex]\theta[/itex]1 and [itex]\theta[/itex]2)

if ([itex]\theta[/itex]1,[itex]\phi[/itex]1) and ([itex]\theta[/itex]2,[itex]\phi[/itex]2) specify two points and we assume that the path is expressed as [itex]\phi[/itex]=[itex]\phi[/itex]([itex]\theta[/itex])."

2. Relevant equations

x=rsin(ϕ)cos(θ)
y=rsin(ϕ)sin(θ)
z=rcos(ϕ)

ds=[itex]\sqrt{dx^2+dy^2+dz^2}[/itex]


3. The attempt at a solution

I'm unsure of how much this question is asking for. I was able to quickly work out the solution after looking up the line element for the surface of a sphere in spherical polar and using that in place of the Cartesian form of ds.

But then I was wondering if whether the question was asking me to derive the line element. It doesn't seem likely since this is one of the * questions which are supposed to be the easiest and I've already completed the ** questions with no difficulty.

In any case, I worked on deriving the line element for the sake of it and got stuck. I found the differentials for x,y and z (dx, dy and dz) and put them into the equation for ds. What do I do from here? Do I tediously expand the brackets involving three terms or is there something that I'm missing?

Thanks in advance.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Apple to unveil 'iWatch' on September 9
NASA deep-space rocket, SLS, to launch in 2018
Study examines 13,000-year-old nanodiamonds from multiple locations across three continents
Oxvillian
#2
Feb10-13, 11:29 PM
P: 166
Probably you can just do this intuitively instead of diving into the algebra - just write down the formula for a distance element along a line of longitude on the sphere, and then along a line of latitude. Use Pythagoras to put them together and you're home and dry
vela
#3
Feb11-13, 04:44 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 11,746
I think you need to adjust your expectations of what constitutes "tedious." When you expand, you'll get only 7 terms. Two of them will obviously cancel, and you can simplify the rest with one or two lines of algebra.

andrien
#4
Feb12-13, 05:04 AM
P: 1,020
Geodesic of a Sphere in spherical polar coordinates (Taylor's Classical Mechanics)

your distance formula will not hold here.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Classical Mechanics: Minimization of geodesic on a sphere Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Divergence in spherical polar coordinates Classical Physics 22
Integral of f over the surface of a sphere (in spherical polar coordinates) Calculus 4
Spherical Polar Coordinates Calculus & Beyond Homework 4