Sequence of rationals that converge to irrational

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tonebone10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Irrational Sequence
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a sequence of rational numbers that converges to the square root of 2. Participants explore various methods, including Newton's method, continued fractions, and numerical approximations, without reaching a consensus on the best approach.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using Newton's binomial theorem to find a sequence converging to the square root of 2.
  • Another participant proposes Newton's method for approximating the positive root of the equation x² - 2, providing a recursive formula for generating rational terms.
  • A participant mentions that a calculator provides a finite sequence of rational approximations to the square root of 2.
  • One participant introduces the idea of using the convergents of the continued fraction representation of the square root of 2.
  • Another participant expresses a preference for Newton's method as a clear way to display the converging sequence, while critiquing the format of another participant's definition of the square root of 2.
  • A participant clarifies their understanding of convergents and provides a sequence derived from the continued fraction representation, questioning the need for proof that this converges to the square root of 2.
  • One participant acknowledges a misunderstanding regarding the notation used by another, emphasizing the importance of an infinite sequence for convergence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the best method to represent a sequence converging to the square root of 2, with no clear consensus reached. Some favor Newton's method, while others advocate for continued fractions or numerical approximations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the limitations of finite sequences provided by calculators and the necessity of infinite sequences for true convergence. There is also mention of the standard nature of the notation used in continued fractions.

tonebone10
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Find a sequence of rational numbers that converges to the square root of 2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
use Newton's binomial theorem? i.e. (1+1)^(1/2) = 1 + (1/2) + (1/2)(-1/2)(1/2) +

+ (1/2)(-1/2)(-3/2)(1/2)(1/3)+...

this might work.
 
Or another of Newton's tricks:

How do I approximate the positive root of [tex]x^2-2[/tex]?

[tex]x_1 = 1[/tex]

[tex]x_2 = x_1 - \frac{x_1^2 - 2}{2x_1}[/tex]

[tex]. \ . \ .[/tex]

[tex]x_n = x_{n-1} - \frac{x_{n-1}^2 - 2}{2x_{n-1}}[/tex]

[tex]. \ . \ .[/tex]

Obviously each term is rational and [tex]\{x_n\}[/tex] converges to [tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex].
 
Last edited:
And converges quite quickly, I might add.
 
Do you mean giving a general formula?

If not, take the square root of 2 on a calculator:
1.4142135623730950488016887242097

So a sequence of rationals converging to square root of 2 is:
1, 1.4, 1.41, 1.414, 1.4142, 1.41421, 1.414213, 1.4142135, 1.41421356, etc.
 
the problem here is that a calculator has a bounded number of terms.
 
You could take the sequence of convergents of the continued fraction of sqrt(2).

[tex]\sqrt{2}=1+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{2+\ldots}}}[/tex]
 
I think Data's use of Newton's Method is the best way to display the sequence that converges. Shmoe's definition of the square root of two is correct, but it isn't really written in a form that converges, although I'm sure shmoe could easily do that. I think good old Newton can help you best.
 
Jameson said:
Shmoe's definition of the square root of two is correct, but it isn't really written in a form that converges...

I'm not sure what you mean here. The notation I used is pretty standard, and the sequence of convergents does converge to [tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex].

Maybe I should have defined what I meant by the convergents. I just mean the sequence begining

[tex]1,1+\frac{1}{2}, 1+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{2}}, 1+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{2}}},\ldots[/tex]

Or do you want some proof that this continued fraction is actually [tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex]?

[tex]\sqrt{2}=1+(\sqrt{2}-1)=1+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{2}}[/tex]

Then repeat:

[tex]\sqrt{2}=1+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{2}}}=1+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{2}}}},\ldots[/tex]

In this way you can easily see [tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex] is larger than all the even convergents and smaller than all the odd convergents (calling the first term the 0th). If you believe that they convegre to something (this is pretty standard) then that something has to be [tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #10
I didn't see the "..." you had included. I just wanted to make sure it was understood that the sequence had to keep going in order to converge. It sounded worse than I meant it. I just liked the way Data wrote the convergence of Newton's Method, with "nth" notation. You are of course very correct with all you said... didn't mean to imply otherwise.
 
  • #11
Oh I see :smile: The ... are quite small, I would have probably missed them if I didn't know I put it there.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K