## about spring constant and Hooke's law

Hi all,
I am reading an online material on elastic force and Hooke's law on spring. The definition of the Hooke's law reads that the restoring force is linear proportional to the displacement of the spring with constant k. The restoring force is defined as the force bringing the object back to the equilibrium position and k characterize the system's (spring's) nature. So if we have a spring with equilibrium position sitting in the origin of the coordinate so the restoring force F satisfies
$$F = -k x$$
Now, if there is a way to add a second force ($F'$) which is exactly the same as $F$ (same direction and magnitude), since $F'$ is along $F$ all the time, so $F'$ always pointing toward the equilibrium position too. In this sense, should I conclude that
$$F+F' = 2F = -k' x$$
if so, can we say that by adding an additional force $F'$, the spring constant k changed to k'=k/2 ? But I think the spring constant should be given by the spring only, so how does the paradox come from?

 PhysOrg.com physics news on PhysOrg.com >> Iron-platinum alloys could be new-generation hard drives>> Lab sets a new record for creating heralded photons>> Breakthrough calls time on bootleg booze
 Recognitions: Homework Help The spring constant k will be constant for a spring of given dimensions. If you have a force F applied on the spring such that F = kx and you apply a second identical force then the extension 'x' will just double as well.

 Quote by rock.freak667 The spring constant k will be constant for a spring of given dimensions. If you have a force F applied on the spring such that F = kx and you apply a second identical force then the extension 'x' will just double as well.
Thanks rock. You are right, I totally forget that the displacement should be changed too if I double the force.