Register to reply

Poincaré Conjecture proven?

by Icebreaker
Tags: conjecture, poincare, proven
Share this thread:
Icebreaker
#1
Mar19-05, 07:54 PM
P: n/a
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/news/2003-04-15/poincare/

Is the proof considered valid? Did he claim the millennium prize? I can't find any recent news about it.
Phys.Org News Partner Mathematics news on Phys.org
Heat distributions help researchers to understand curved space
Professor quantifies how 'one thing leads to another'
Team announces construction of a formal computer-verified proof of the Kepler conjecture
CrankFan
#2
Mar19-05, 09:16 PM
P: 135
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/West/01/07/math.mystery.ap/
Icebreaker
#3
Mar20-05, 02:47 PM
P: n/a
It simply says "may", it still isn't confirmed whether he claimed the Clay prize.

CrankFan
#4
Mar20-05, 05:37 PM
P: 135
Poincaré Conjecture proven?

Quote Quote by Icebreaker
It simply says "may", it still isn't confirmed whether he claimed the Clay prize.
Right. I just thought in case you hadn't seen that article, that you would like too.
mathwonk
#5
Mar20-05, 09:57 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
mathwonk's Avatar
P: 9,488
why don't you read the articels and find out?
Icebreaker
#6
Mar21-05, 08:09 AM
P: n/a
I have read it; one of them is a year old, and the other is two.
cronxeh
#7
Mar21-05, 10:58 AM
PF Gold
cronxeh's Avatar
P: 1,236
"Russian may have solved great math mystery"

Heh. After over a year I still think that is the dumbest title I've ever seen
honestrosewater
#8
Mar21-05, 11:41 AM
PF Gold
honestrosewater's Avatar
P: 2,330
http://www.math.sunysb.edu/~anderson/noticesfinal.pdf
-Feb 2004
mathwonk
#9
Mar21-05, 03:55 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
mathwonk's Avatar
P: 9,488
if you have read it, can you tell us if you believe the proof is correct?
Icebreaker
#10
Mar21-05, 04:09 PM
P: n/a
The articles themselves do not offer any details about the proof.
mathwonk
#11
Mar21-05, 09:25 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
mathwonk's Avatar
P: 9,488
do you mean the proof is not published?
Icebreaker
#12
Mar21-05, 10:11 PM
P: n/a
As far as I can see (from the articles), Perelman did not publish his results in any journals, and only circulated them to mathematicians whom he knows. Consequently, he is not technically eligible for the Clay prize, but there is word that Clay may eventually make an exception in his case. That was last year; I haven't any more recent news.
mruncleramos
#13
Mar21-05, 11:33 PM
P: 49
He probably is not doing it for the money though. Maybe that's why he's doing it the way he is doing it.
TenaliRaman
#14
Mar22-05, 03:55 AM
P: 646
He definitely isnt doing it for money and isnt publicising it either. He had declared so earlier or so i read in one of the articles once. (Quite contrary to Mr De Branges :p). The proof is believed to be correct and i think it would be under controlled review for some more time, before it is published.

You may read a nice review of the conjecture and the proposed proof here,
http://www.ams.org/bull/2005-42-01/S...04-01045-6.pdf

I daresay, i understand that (i mean its all greek to me). But still a nice read, if u are to able to read "Unabridged Dictionary" as "Under the bridge with dick and harry". :)

-- AI


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Poincare conjecture General Math 5
Poincare conjecture? General Math 2
Poincare conjecture. Differential Geometry 7
Poincare conjecture Linear & Abstract Algebra 3
The Poincare Conjecture. Differential Geometry 3