Poincaré Conjecture proven?


by Icebreaker
Tags: conjecture, poincare, proven
Icebreaker
#1
Mar19-05, 07:54 PM
P: n/a
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/news/2003-04-15/poincare/

Is the proof considered valid? Did he claim the millennium prize? I can't find any recent news about it.
Phys.Org News Partner Mathematics news on Phys.org
Researchers help Boston Marathon organizers plan for 2014 race
'Math detective' analyzes odds for suspicious lottery wins
Pseudo-mathematics and financial charlatanism
CrankFan
CrankFan is offline
#2
Mar19-05, 09:16 PM
P: 135
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/West/01/07/math.mystery.ap/
Icebreaker
#3
Mar20-05, 02:47 PM
P: n/a
It simply says "may", it still isn't confirmed whether he claimed the Clay prize.

CrankFan
CrankFan is offline
#4
Mar20-05, 05:37 PM
P: 135

Poincaré Conjecture proven?


Quote Quote by Icebreaker
It simply says "may", it still isn't confirmed whether he claimed the Clay prize.
Right. I just thought in case you hadn't seen that article, that you would like too.
mathwonk
mathwonk is offline
#5
Mar20-05, 09:57 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
mathwonk's Avatar
P: 9,422
why don't you read the articels and find out?
Icebreaker
#6
Mar21-05, 08:09 AM
P: n/a
I have read it; one of them is a year old, and the other is two.
cronxeh
cronxeh is offline
#7
Mar21-05, 10:58 AM
PF Gold
cronxeh's Avatar
P: 1,236
"Russian may have solved great math mystery"

Heh. After over a year I still think that is the dumbest title I've ever seen
honestrosewater
honestrosewater is offline
#8
Mar21-05, 11:41 AM
PF Gold
honestrosewater's Avatar
P: 2,330
http://www.math.sunysb.edu/~anderson/noticesfinal.pdf
-Feb 2004
mathwonk
mathwonk is offline
#9
Mar21-05, 03:55 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
mathwonk's Avatar
P: 9,422
if you have read it, can you tell us if you believe the proof is correct?
Icebreaker
#10
Mar21-05, 04:09 PM
P: n/a
The articles themselves do not offer any details about the proof.
mathwonk
mathwonk is offline
#11
Mar21-05, 09:25 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
mathwonk's Avatar
P: 9,422
do you mean the proof is not published?
Icebreaker
#12
Mar21-05, 10:11 PM
P: n/a
As far as I can see (from the articles), Perelman did not publish his results in any journals, and only circulated them to mathematicians whom he knows. Consequently, he is not technically eligible for the Clay prize, but there is word that Clay may eventually make an exception in his case. That was last year; I haven't any more recent news.
mruncleramos
mruncleramos is offline
#13
Mar21-05, 11:33 PM
P: 49
He probably is not doing it for the money though. Maybe that's why he's doing it the way he is doing it.
TenaliRaman
TenaliRaman is offline
#14
Mar22-05, 03:55 AM
P: 646
He definitely isnt doing it for money and isnt publicising it either. He had declared so earlier or so i read in one of the articles once. (Quite contrary to Mr De Branges :p). The proof is believed to be correct and i think it would be under controlled review for some more time, before it is published.

You may read a nice review of the conjecture and the proposed proof here,
http://www.ams.org/bull/2005-42-01/S...04-01045-6.pdf

I daresay, i understand that (i mean its all greek to me). But still a nice read, if u are to able to read "Unabridged Dictionary" as "Under the bridge with dick and harry". :)

-- AI


Register to reply

Related Discussions
[SOLVED] poincare conjecture General Math 5
Poincare conjecture? General Math 2
Poincare conjecture. Differential Geometry 7
Poincare conjecture Linear & Abstract Algebra 3
The Poincare Conjecture. Differential Geometry 3