An exercise in eloquence: Basic GTR

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Crosson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exercise
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Einstein's General Theory of Relativity (GTR) is fundamentally a theory of gravity because it describes how gravitational and inertial forces are equivalent, as stated by the equivalence principle. This principle leads to the conclusion that while local inertial frames exist, a globally inertial coordinate system is not always available. GTR is also a geometric theory, utilizing differential geometry to model gravitational interactions, contrasting with Newtonian gravity's limitations in general covariance. The stress-energy tensor serves as the covariant representation of the gravitational field, integrating mass-energy equivalence from special relativity into the framework of GTR.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's equivalence principle
  • Familiarity with differential geometry concepts
  • Knowledge of the stress-energy tensor in physics
  • Basic grasp of Newtonian gravity and its equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the equivalence principle in various physical contexts
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of differential geometry
  • Learn about the stress-energy tensor and its applications in general relativity
  • Investigate the limitations of Newtonian gravity compared to GTR
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and researchers interested in advanced concepts of general relativity, particularly those focusing on the geometric interpretation of gravity and the mathematical frameworks that support it.

Crosson
Messages
1,256
Reaction score
4
I have two questions that were on a (past due) take home test in my GTR class. There maybe many answers, but I am interested in the best answers.

1) Why is einstein's GTR a theory of gravity?

2) Why is einstein's GTR a geometric theory?

I welcome anyone who thinks they have an answer to post it, but I am particularly interested in the more sophisticated answers. (In other words, don't look at these as shallow novice questions). I will post my answers (for critique) after I see some of yours.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equiavlence princple is all you need, which staes grviataional and inertial forces are equiavelent.

The immediate result of this is that there is not always a globally inertial coordinate system (only in special case of a globally pseudo-Euclidean geometry) though locally there is always an inertial coordinate system. Compare to the axiomatixc definition of a manifold which can be thought of as locally Euclidean, but not always globally Euclidean and you should see that differential geometry could be used to model gravity.
 
Here is my answer to #1: (sorry for the length)

GTR is a statement of the laws of physics that has the same form in all frames of reference. With respect to gravitation, Newton’s theory accomplishes this for all inertial observers:

[tex]\nabla^2 \Phi = 4 \pi G \rho[/tex]

[tex]\vec{a} = -\nabla \Phi[/tex]

For a simple reason, this expression of gravity cannot be generally covariant. With respect to a general transformation, the components of the acceleration vector will transform, so the gradient of the potential must transform, but the mass density in Poisson’s equation does not transform. (A classicist would say Poisson’s equation was correct, and that we had introduced pseudo forces through our choice of frame.)

Einstein firmly believed general covariance was possible, and that an updated law of gravitation which involved the mass energy equivalence of special relativity would be a necessary part of his General Theory. The natural covariant representation of mass-energy is called the stress-energy tensor. So, following this line of reasoning:

(Covariant Representation of Gravitational Field) = (Stress-Energy Tensor)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K