Proof by Induction: Proving fm+n=(fm * fn+1) + (fm-1 * fn) for m,n>=1

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathrocks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the identity fm+n=(fm * fn+1) + (fm-1 * fn) for m,n≥1 using mathematical induction, specifically focusing on identifying appropriate base cases for the proof.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in determining the base cases for the induction proof.
  • Another participant suggests using n=1 as a base case and claims that the statement holds true based on the Fibonacci sequence definition.
  • Some participants propose that two base cases, n=1 and n=2, are necessary for the proof.
  • A participant introduces the idea of nested induction, indicating that the proof may require establishing the statement for m=2 first before proceeding with m+1.
  • There is a mention of a teacher's guidance suggesting a mathematical method to determine base cases, which one participant finds difficult to follow.
  • Another participant reiterates the principle of induction, emphasizing the need to prove the statement for a base case and its subsequent case.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that multiple base cases are needed, but there is no consensus on the specific base cases or the method of induction to be used.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the need for strong induction and nested induction, indicating potential complexities in the proof that are not fully resolved.

mathrocks
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
The following question has been giving me problems because I'm stuck trying to find what the base cases would be.

Let m be a given positive integer with m>=2(So m remains constant throughout the problem) Let fn be the sequence of fibonacci numbers. Prove that for every integer n>=1, fm+n=(fm * fn+1) + (fm-1 * fn).

I'm not sure how I go about finding the base cases to start the proof. I know I'm suppose to set something equal to >=1 but I'm not sure what.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you want to do induction on n, the base case involve setting n = 1 and proving that f(m + 1) = f(m) * f(2) + f(m - 1) * f(1) (for m >= 2). That statement is obviously true (see the definition of the Fibonacci sequence).

I think this problem requires strong induction too, btw.
 
Last edited:
Muzza said:
If you want to do induction on n, the base case involve setting n = 1 and proving that f(m + 1) = f(m) * f(2) + f(m - 1) * f(1) (for m >= 2). That statement is obviously true (see the definition of the Fibonacci sequence).

I think this problem requires strong induction too, btw.

But my teacher has told us that in this specific problem there are more than one base case needed.
 
For induction you need two bases. Do it for n=1 and n=2 , and from there you should be able to state that induction proves the idea.
 
I think this problem requires a sort of nested induction and that's what your teacher was hinting at.
First you have to prove the fn statement for m=2 (using induction),
then you have to prove the m+1 case of the fn statement (using induction again).
 
whozum said:
For induction you need two bases. Do it for n=1 and n=2 , and from there you should be able to state that induction proves the idea.

But where did you come up with the base cases needing to be n=1 and n=2. My teacher tried to explain a mathematical way of figuring out the base cases to use but I couldn't follow it.
 
The basic principle of induction is:
If a function is true for a base 'n' and true for the base 'n+1' , then it will be true for all n.

So if you can prove that your idea is true for a number 'n', and a number 'n+1' then you have proven that it will be true for any number larger than n. Conventionally you start at n=0 or n=1, it follows from the laws of continuity that induction holds.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K