Is the Integral of (f(x)-q(g(x)))^2 Greater Than Zero?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mruncleramos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of integrals involving the functions f and g, particularly focusing on the expression (f(x)-q(g(x)))^2 and its implications for integrability. Participants explore theoretical aspects, including conditions under which the integral is greater than zero, and delve into related concepts from analysis, such as Lebesgue's condition for integrability and the Schwarz inequality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the integral of (f(x)-q(g(x)))^2 is greater than zero if (f(x)-q(g(x)))^2 is greater than zero for all real q.
  • Another participant suggests considering the area under the curve of the function to understand the implications of it being greater than zero.
  • A participant introduces Lebesgue's condition for integrability, implying that the integral exists and is related to lower/upper sums, but does not provide a definitive answer to the original question.
  • One participant discusses a problem from a calculus text regarding the Schwarz inequality for integrals, noting the need to consider different cases for the integral of (f - λg) and expressing confusion about the hint provided in the text.
  • Another participant reiterates the problem from the calculus text, emphasizing the need to prove the inequality and the relevance of the cases where the integral equals zero or is greater than zero.
  • Concerns are raised about the applicability of certain arguments used in linear independence to the context of integrals, suggesting that the relationship may not hold as it does for functions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the implications of the integral being greater than zero, with some exploring theoretical conditions while others focus on specific mathematical problems. No consensus is reached regarding the original question or the interpretations of the hints from the calculus text.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference Lebesgue's condition for integrability and the Schwarz inequality, indicating a reliance on advanced mathematical concepts. The discussion includes unresolved questions about the conditions under which the integral yields nonzero values and the interpretation of hints from mathematical texts.

mruncleramos
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Lets say we have two functions f and g that are riemann integrableon the interval [a,b] If (f(x)-q(g(x)))^2 is greater than zero for all real q, is the integral from a to b of (f(x)-q(g(x)))^2 greater than zero? Also, let's say we have a function h(x) that is defined from [0,1] as follows: f(x) is zero if x is not 0.5 and if x is 0.5, then f(x) is a number, let's say 15. What is the integral from a to b of this function? If it is zero, we can continue to add points. When does this process yield a nonzero integral?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first question, just think of what such a function would look like. If a function is greater than zero for all real q, then what does this say about the area.

For the second function, do you know Lebesgue's condition for integrability? This sounds like an analysis-type class, so you might have covered it. Basically, Lebesgue's condition would tell you that such an integral exists and is equal to the lower/upper sum (here, the lower sum is easier, since every neighborhood of a point on [a,b] contains an x such that f(x)=0).

I think the answer to your final question would follow from just a little more thought on what I said above.

I'm sorry if you don't know Lebesgue's condition for integrability. I'm not trying to pull some higher math on you-- I did learn that last semester in Real Analysis I.
 
Just for contextualization. I just finished Calculus on Manifolds, and I'm coming back to some of the problems that i thought could have had better solutions to. Problem 6 of chapter one asks you to prove the schwarz ineqaulity for integrals. Spivak inserts a cryptic (in my opinion) hint: Consider separately the cases [tex]$\int_{a}^{b} f(x) - \lambda g(x) dx$ = 0[/tex] and [tex]$\int_{a}^{b} f(x) - \lambda g(x) dx$ > 0[/tex]


I suppose this is supposed to include all possibilites of f and g. So far, I've used the latter inequality to derive part of the schwarz inequality, but i cannot find a use for the former. Oh yeah. Excuse me for being picky, but i have to figure out what spivak meant by this hint. I don't want to use riemann sums.
 
Last edited:
mruncleramos said:
Just for contextualization. I just finished Calculus on Manifolds, and I'm coming back to some of the problems that i thought could have had better solutions to. Problem 6 of chapter one asks you to prove the schwarz ineqaulity for integrals. Spivak inserts a cryptic (in my opinion) hint: Consider separately the cases [tex]$\int_{a}^{b} f(x) - \lambda g(x) dx$ = 0[/tex] and [tex]$\int_{a}^{b} f(x) - \lambda g(x) dx$ > 0[/tex]


I suppose this is supposed to include all possibilites of f and g. So far, I've used the latter inequality to derive part of the schwarz inequality, but i cannot find a use for the former. Oh yeah. Excuse me for being picky, but i have to figure out what spivak meant by this hint. I don't want to use riemann sums.

I have the book as well. The LateX seems somewhat mixed up, so I`ll just copy the problem:
Spivak asks to prove that:
[tex]\left| \int_a^b f \cdot g \right| \leq (\int_a^b f^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}\cdot (\int_a^b g^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}[/tex]
for integrable functions f,g on [a,b],
and hints to consider separately the cases:

[tex]0 = \int_a^b (f-\lambda g)^2[/tex]
for some [itex]\lambda \in \mathbb{R}[/itex] and
[tex]0 < \int_a^b (f-\lambda g)^2[/tex]
for all [itex]\lambda \in \mathbb{R}[/itex].

This covers all cases, since for any two integrable functions f,g on [a,b] there either exists a [itex]\lambda[/itex] such that the integral is zero, or for all [itex]\lambda[/itex] the integral is not equal to zero. (The proof that is must be greater than zero is actually the point of this thread).

You cannot mimic Theorem 1-1 (2)exactly, since he uses the argument that x and y are either linearly dependent or not and uses the fact that if they are linearly independent, then [itex]\lambda y-x \neq 0[/itex] for all [itex]\lambda[/itex] and so [itex]0<|\lambda y-x|^2[/itex] for all [itex]\lambda[/itex] (by theorem 1-1 (1)).
You cannot use this argument for the integral, because even if f and g are linearly independent, it is not necessarily the case that:

[itex]\int_a^b (f-\lambda g)^2 > 0[/itex] for all [itex]\lambda[/itex]. ([itex]||f||=(\int_a^b f^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}[/itex] does not constitute a norm on the given space).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K