Register to reply

Kinetic energy question. (layman)

by Moris526
Tags: energy, kinetic, layman
Share this thread:
Moris526
#1
Apr11-13, 06:30 AM
P: 16
Hi all.
English is not my native language, so bare with me (joke i found googling the right word). Im from Argentina.
My question.

If i throw a ball, i have learned it has kinetic energy. But if motion is relative doesnt that mean that my hand has the kinetic energy too?

thanks.
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
First in-situ images of void collapse in explosives
The first supercomputer simulations of 'spin?orbit' forces between neutrons and protons in an atomic nucleus
Magnets for fusion energy: A revolutionary manufacturing method developed
A.T.
#2
Apr11-13, 06:44 AM
P: 3,910
Quote Quote by Moris526 View Post
But if motion is relative doesnt that mean that my has the kinetic energy too?
Yes.
jtbell
#3
Apr11-13, 09:26 AM
Mentor
jtbell's Avatar
P: 11,609
Quote Quote by Moris526 View Post
doesnt that mean that my has the kinetic energy too?
I think you omitted a word in the area that I put in boldface. My (your) what has?

Moris526
#4
Apr11-13, 11:28 AM
P: 16
Kinetic energy question. (layman)

Sorry. Yes, I omitted the word ¨HAND¨.
CAB12
#5
Apr11-13, 10:50 PM
P: 2
Kinetic energy is a property of anything in motion. The term kinetic means motion.
Moris526
#6
Apr12-13, 06:34 AM
P: 16
Quote Quote by CAB12 View Post
Kinetic energy is a property of anything in motion. The term kinetic means motion.
I dont get it. If anything in motion has kinetic energy and motion is relative then the kinetic motion of an abject is relative? if an object passes me by it has kinetic energy but if i move with it, it does not?

Confused here!.
A.T.
#7
Apr12-13, 06:47 AM
P: 3,910
Quote Quote by Moris526 View Post
I dont get it. If anything in motion has kinetic energy and motion is relative then the kinetic motion of an abject is relative?
Yes.
Mentalist
#8
Apr12-13, 07:07 AM
P: 32
Quote Quote by Moris526 View Post
I dont get it. If anything in motion has kinetic energy and motion is relative then the kinetic motion of an abject is relative? if an object passes me by it has kinetic energy but if i move with it, it does not?

Confused here!.
Hand has kinetic energy ball does not, it isn't moving. Only thing the ball has is internal energy.

Ball thrown, thus has kinetic energy. What matters here is the direction you are throwing it, up, down, left, or right? That would be the reference frame.

Relative motion = you on a plane moving.
A.T.
#9
Apr12-13, 07:49 AM
P: 3,910
See also:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic...e_of_reference
CompuChip
#10
Apr12-13, 07:54 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 4,300
Just to be clear: you are talking about after the ball was thrown, right? Or do you mean while throwing the ball?
Moris526
#11
Apr12-13, 12:22 PM
P: 16
Quote Quote by CompuChip View Post
Just to be clear: you are talking about after the ball was thrown, right? Or do you mean while throwing the ball?
Yes, after.
Moris526
#12
Apr12-13, 12:32 PM
P: 16
Wikipedia " In physics, the kinetic energy of an object is the energy which it possesses due to its motion.[1] It is defined as the work needed to accelerate a body of a given mass from rest to its stated velocity"

Where is the kinetic energy? If it is in the object and comes from an acceleration, that is in relation to a frame of reference, right?. So the object has a diferent kinetic energy in diferent frames of reference? Or it has kinetic energy from a frame of reference?
MostlyHarmless
#13
Apr12-13, 12:34 PM
MostlyHarmless's Avatar
P: 266
Quote Quote by Moris526 View Post
I dont get it. If anything in motion has kinetic energy and motion is relative then the kinetic motion of an abject is relative? if an object passes me by it has kinetic energy but if i move with it, it does not?

Confused here!.
That is in part correct. Relative to you running it has less kinetic energy than if you were standing still, that is: If I throw a ball at you at 10m/s and it hits you while you're standing still, then I throw the same ball at you at the same speed, but this time you are running away at 5m/s. The ball has the same amount of kinetic energy in both instances, but getting hit with the ball in case one will hurt more than getting hit by the ball in case 2.
Moris526
#14
Apr12-13, 12:59 PM
P: 16
Quote Quote by Jesse H. View Post
That is in part correct. Relative to you running it has less kinetic energy than if you were standing still, that is: If I throw a ball at you at 10m/s and it hits you while you're standing still, then I throw the same ball at you at the same speed, but this time you are running away at 5m/s. The ball has the same amount of kinetic energy in both instances, but getting hit with the ball in case one will hurt more than getting hit by the ball in case 2.
If i measure the energy of the ball as it is approaching me, don't i get different ones? If this is true, the total energy of an object is not absolute?
Drakkith
#15
Apr12-13, 01:41 PM
Mentor
Drakkith's Avatar
P: 11,508
Quote Quote by Moris526 View Post
If i measure the energy of the ball as it is approaching me, don't i get different ones? If this is true, the total energy of an object is not absolute?
Exactly. It is relative.
CompuChip
#16
Apr13-13, 07:30 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 4,300
Yes, correct:



Register to reply

Related Discussions
Pile driver question kinetic energy and potential energy Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 1
Quick question regarding kinetic energy, potential energy and velocity. General Physics 8
Question about vibrational kinetic energy and potential energy. Introductory Physics Homework 1
Kinetic energy and potential energy concept question Introductory Physics Homework 4
Gravitational potential energy = kinetic energy question Introductory Physics Homework 4