Proof of Binary Quadratic Forms and Modulo Squares with Hint

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a property of binary quadratic forms and their representations, specifically focusing on the relationship between a number represented by a quadratic form and its discriminant. Participants explore various approaches to the proof, including the use of the Jacobi symbol, completing the square, and specific cases involving Legendre symbols.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how to start the proof regarding the representation of a number by a quadratic form and its implications for modular squares.
  • Another participant clarifies that a binary quadratic form is defined as f(x,y)=ax^2+bxy+cy^2, and emphasizes the meaning of representation in this context.
  • A suggestion is made to replace terms in the quadratic form and expand to show that 4af(x,y) is a square mod |d|.
  • One participant relates the discussion to the theory behind the multiple polynomial quadratic sieve, indicating a connection to practical applications.
  • Another participant presents a related problem involving the representation of primes by a specific quadratic form and discusses the discriminant and Legendre symbols.
  • Concerns are raised about the assumptions made regarding the representation of p as a binary quadratic form and the implications of the discriminant not being a perfect square.
  • Participants challenge each other's steps and reasoning, indicating a lack of clarity in some arguments and suggesting further justification is needed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the proof or the steps involved. There are multiple competing views on how to approach the problem, and several participants express confusion or seek clarification on specific points.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for clearer justification of steps taken in the proof, particularly regarding the representation of numbers by quadratic forms and the implications of the discriminant. There is also mention of specific modular conditions that need to be satisfied, which are not fully resolved in the discussion.

b0mb0nika
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
show that if a number n is represented by a quadratic form f of discriminant d then 4an is a square mod |d|.

I have no clue how to even start this proof. I tried using the jacobi symbol.. but it's not gettin me anywhere.

Could someone give me a hint.. :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
show that if a number n is represented by a quadratic form f of discriminant d

I can't translate this into something that makes sense. :frown: But I might just not be familiar with the jargon. What does it mean for this to be so?
 
[tex]f(x,y)=ax^2+bxy+cy^2[/tex] is a binary quadratic form with discriminant [tex]d=b^2-4ac[/tex]. (a, b, c integers).

Saying n is represented by f means we have integers x, y where [tex]n=f(x,y)[/tex].

So we just have to show [tex]4af(x,y)=4a^2x^2+4abxy+4acy^2[/tex] is a square mod |d|.

But this b0mb0nika knows :smile:

hint:replace [tex]4ac[/tex] with [tex]b^2-d[/tex], expand and stare.
 
Or... just complete the square!


I figured it was something like that -- I just didn't get from "represented by a quadratic form" to "an evaluation of a quadratic form".

Interestingly enough, I've recently used almost this exact thing -- it's the key bit of theory behind the multiple polynomial quadratic sieve! (slightly different, but morally the same!)
 
ok well if u put it that way it's not that hard:)
ok related to that question i have to show that if p = x^2+5y^2
than (p/5 ) ( the legendre symbol) = 1 or 0 and that p is represented like that iff
p =5 or p == 1 or 9 mod (20)

ok this is what i did:
discriminant = -20

i showed that (p/5) = 1 or 0

now if p = 5 or 1 or 9 ( mod 20)
let p = ax^2 + bxy + cy^2
then 4ap == 1,4,9,16 ( mod 20)
then ap == 1,4,9 or 16 (mod 20) or ap=5
so now i just show that it works for a=1 and p =5 or p == 1,9 ( mod 20)

and the other way
p = x^2 + 5p^2
then 4p==0,1,4,9,16 ( mod 20)
but we can write p= x^2+5y^2 only for p= 5 or p == 1 or 9 ( mod 20 )

ok does it make sense ?
 
Last edited:
now if p = 5 or 1 or 9 ( mod 20)
let p = ax^2 + bxy + xy^2

I assume you meant cy^2. This raises a flag, though: the identity of p has already been specified, so you can't use this "let" statement to define p. Presumably you mean it to specify a, b, c, x, and y, but that begs the question "Why can p be written in that form?"


As for the other direction, I don't follow at all. You're correct that 4p is equivalent to 0, 1, 4, 9, or 16, but the next sentence doesn't make any sense.
 
yes i did mean cy^2

for the frist part i guess i just assumed that p could be written as a binary quadratic form... i'll have to think about that

and for the second part i just took 4p = 0 ( mod 20), 4p = 1 ( mod 20 ) .. etc.. and solved for p
 
ok let me see if i got the first part now :

let p = 5 or 1 or 9 ( mod 20)
then p can be written as follows p = ax^2 + bxy + cy^2 ( for all p : you can let
a=p and x =1, y = 0 )

then 4ap == 1,4,9,16 ( mod 20)
then ap == 1,4,9 or 16 (mod 20) or ap=5
but we already said p =5 or p == 1 or 9 ( more 20 )
then a = 1
because the discriminant is not a perfect square ( 20 ) -|a|<b<=|a|<|c|
so b could be 0 or 1
b = 1 is impossible ( 1-4ac = |20| => c is not an integer )
so b = 0 , in which case - 4ac = -4c = -20 so c = 5
 
Justify your steps.

P.S. you do realize that if 4x=y (mod 20) has one solution for x, then it has 4 solutions, right?
 
  • #10
i'm not exactely sure what u mean.. but i think i got it more or less right..i'm going to write it like that.. maybe explain more what i did..
thx again for the hint
 
  • #11
Then you might want to look at it again -- I don't follow a single step of your argument. :frown:
 
  • #12
b0mb0nika said:
ok let me see if i got the first part now :

let p = 5 or 1 or 9 ( mod 20)
then p can be written as follows p = ax^2 + bxy + cy^2 ( for all p : you can let
a=p and x =1, y = 0 )

then 4ap == 1,4,9,16 ( mod 20)
then ap == 1,4,9 or 16 (mod 20) or ap=5
but we already said p =5 or p == 1 or 9 ( more 20 )
then a = 1
because the discriminant is not a perfect square ( 20 ) -|a|<b<=|a|<|c|
so b could be 0 or 1
b = 1 is impossible ( 1-4ac = |20| => c is not an integer )
so b = 0 , in which case - 4ac = -4c = -20 so c = 5

It looks like you're skipping something here. You need to first show that p can be represented by a quadratic form with discriminant -20. Then you can can take an equivalent reduced form and use those bounds on the coefficients. I'm not clear on how you're limiting what 4ap is though?

At this point you could also use your bounds on the coefficients and b^2-4ac=-20 to show that a=1 or 2. This, and consideration of the discriminant again, reduces the number of forms you have to consider to 2 (or 3 if you don't have the machinery to force b>=0), and you can rule out the other by considering it modulo something convenient. This has the added bonus of finding (with a small amount of extra work) a quadratic form that represents primes congruent to 3 and 7 mod 20.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K