Military to Peace: A World Without War

  • Thread starter Thread starter ArielGenesis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Military
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the hypothetical scenario of all soldiers quitting the military simultaneously and the immediate implications for global peace and conflict. It touches on themes of societal reaction, the nature of power, and the potential for conflict arising from various groups, rather than just nation-states.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the outcome of soldiers quitting would depend on whether they would re-enlist or not.
  • There is a recognition that not all conflict arises from nations, as various groups can also instigate trouble.
  • One viewpoint expresses optimism about a world free of war but acknowledges the reality of groups that may exploit the absence of military forces.
  • Another participant argues that if one country disbanded its military, it would likely be threatened by others, leading to a power vacuum filled by non-governmental groups.
  • Some participants propose that conflict is an inherent aspect of human society, driven by the desire for power and protection.
  • There are humorous takes on the chaos that might ensue, including references to anarchy and predatory animals.
  • Concerns are raised about the existence of harmful individuals beyond soldiers, suggesting that threats to peace are multifaceted.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus on the implications of a military-free world. Some agree on the inevitability of conflict, while others emphasize the potential for peace under certain conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants make various assumptions about societal reactions and the nature of power dynamics, which are not fully explored or resolved in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring themes of conflict, peace studies, military sociology, and the dynamics of power in society.

ArielGenesis
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
Military>>>Peace?

If every soilder from militarry quit at this second, what the world is like for the next second ? :approve:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That would depend upon whether re-enlisted or not, I think..
 
well aside the fact you can't just quite the military..but i see where your coming from - but do you mean in the world? or this country? because you need to note not all people whom cause trouble is an actual nation, but various groups of other people that oppose another cause
 
Tough question. The assumptions that are made about the reaction of the general population are what determine the outcome.
 
I would personally feel better that the world would be finally free of war... but that is not reality.

Somewhere, guerillas will form up and challenge the government and exploit the people for their own personal gain, and then the government won't have anyone to defend those citizens. If the military is to exist, it should be just for that purpose to achieve a lasting peace. Sadly some people do want to exploit others and put them in danger, and there is nothing we can do about it except have a military/law enforcement standing by in case something does go wrong.
 
TsunamiJoe, not every one live in US. I think if only one country does it, then that country will be quickly eliminated by the other. Then there are also some non-govermental group who will treathen us. Yet some or might be mostly of the guerillas are ex-militer.

What i do believe now that one day, that will happen. do you ?
 
ArielGenesis said:
If every soilder from militarry quit at this second, what the world is like for the next second ? :approve:
The world would be gullible for the next second.

Right after that moment, groups of people would then form their own militaries, which will then develop into national armies - and similar to what we have now. In other words, conflict will always be there. It's because people want to attain and increase power - to protect themselves from people who would endanger their freedoms.

Peace is only attained when a group takes it upon themselves to cooperate in order to improve their situation - their power, freedom, abilities, etc. If that contract ever stops being helpful, the peace will end. Peace because people are tired of death and suffering will only last for a finite amount of time - or until the next guy with a great thirst for power comes along.
 
Last edited:
ArielGenesis said:
If every soilder from militarry quit at this second, what the world is like for the next second ? :approve:

Complete anarchy, then lions, tigers and crocodiles would eat us.
 
ariel - that was what i was getting at in my post that if it were just one country they would be eliminated, and if it was the world to be rid of it, mofias, syndicates, and cartels(just to name a few) would assume power
 
  • #10
There are people out there besides soldiers to do harm...
 
  • #11
I was thinking i haven't killed enoguh threads as of late, and this one seemed ripe from the first post. So here's a good stab at it.

*stab*
 
  • #12
May one day harm is needless.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K