How Is the Center of Gravity Calculated for a Non-Uniform Rod?

  • Thread starter Thread starter decathlonist
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The center of gravity for a non-uniform rod with a linear mass density defined as l(x) = Ax kg/m is calculated using integration techniques in calculus. The final result for the center of gravity is determined to be at a distance of 2L/3 from one end of the rod. This conclusion is reached by setting the total torque about the center of gravity to zero and using Riemann sums that transition into integrals. The specific integrals used are ∫xl(x)dx and ∫l(x)dx, leading to the derivation of the center of gravity's location.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically integration techniques.
  • Familiarity with linear mass density concepts.
  • Knowledge of torque and its application in physics.
  • Ability to work with Riemann sums and their limits.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Riemann sums in physics problems.
  • Learn more about torque calculations in static equilibrium.
  • Explore advanced integration techniques in calculus.
  • Investigate the implications of non-uniform mass distributions in mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics and calculus, particularly those focusing on mechanics and integration, as well as educators seeking to explain concepts related to center of gravity and torque.

decathlonist
Hello,

I was studying for the test and I ran into the problem that I can't solve.

This problem involves the use of Calculus (in particular - integration). Although I do have a solution for the problem, I don't have any explanation for it. Can someone please tell me how we arrived to the final answer?

"A rod of length L and linear mass density l(x)=Ax kg/m, where A is a constant and x is measured in meters from one end of the rod. Assuming the rod is in a uniform gravitational field, determine the location of the center of the rod."

( center of gravity = 2L/3 )

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure that the answer is 2L/3 ?
Because I think it's L*sqrt(2)/2 (the same as L/sqrt(2))
sqrt -> square root;
[?]
 
As "sir-pinski" was pointing out, you can't do a problem involving center of gravity until you know what that means! (It's remarkable how many people don't seem to notice that you can't do a problem if you don't know the definitions!)
The "center of gravity" is the point at which the rod would balance: the torque (twisting force) on one side about that point is equal to (and opposite) the torque on the other. The torque about a point is itself defined as the force applied times the distance from the point.

Imagine dividing the rod into small lengths, each of length dx, and treat the weight as constant on each small length (this technique should be familiar to you). Take the left end of the bar as x=0 and let "a" be the distance to the center of gravity (I would prefer x with a bar over it but..). For each point on the bar, at distance x from the left end, the distance from the center of gravity is |x-a|. However, if we just use x-a (rather than the absolute value) that will also allow us to treat left and right of it as positive and negative. The mass of each little "piece" of the rod is its density times its length: l(x)dx. The torque about the center of gravity of a little piece of the rod is (x-a)l(x)dx. The total torque would be [sigma](x-a)l(x)dx and in order to be balanced must be 0: [sigma](x-a)l(x)dx = 0 which is the same as [sigma]xl(x)dx= a[sigma]l(x)dx.

These are Riemann sums and in the limit become the integral:

[integral]xl(x)dx= a [integral]l(x)dx.
(The integral on the right is, of course, the total weight of the rod.)

In this particular case l(x)= Ax so [integral]l(x)dx= [integral]Axdx= (1/2)Ax2 evaluated between 0 and L= (1/2)Al2.

[integral]xl(x)dx= [integral]Ax<sup>2</sup>dx= (1/3)Ax<sup>3</sup>
evaluated between 0 and L= (1/3)AL3.

We must have (1/3)A L3= a(1/2)A L2 so

a= (2/3)L as advertised.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
14K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K