Sunglasses which reflects like a mirror

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Pandemonium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mirror
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physical principles behind sunglasses that reflect like a mirror on one side while allowing normal shading on the other. It explores the mechanisms of reflective coatings, including their thickness and the interaction of light with these coatings.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants explain that the reflective quality of sunglasses is due to a coating, potentially involving mercury salts, which creates two reflecting surfaces that can interfere with each other.
  • One participant describes how light behaves as a wave, suggesting that the phase relationship between light reflected from the coating and the original surface determines whether the light adds up or cancels out.
  • Another participant shares a personal experience of applying a thin gold coating to glasses, noting that the thickness of the coating is crucial for allowing some light to transmit while still reflecting effectively.
  • There is mention of the concept of skin depth, which relates to how deep light penetrates into a conductor, with a few nanometers being suggested as the necessary thickness for effective reflection in the visible range.
  • A later reply seeks clarification on the optimal thickness for the coating to avoid conducting the electric field, indicating ongoing inquiry into the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present various explanations and insights, but there is no consensus on the exact mechanisms or optimal thickness for the coatings. The discussion remains exploratory with multiple viewpoints expressed.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the specific conditions under which the coatings operate effectively, nor does it clarify the assumptions regarding the materials used or the definitions of terms like skin depth.

Pandemonium
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I hope this is the correct place to put this...

There are certain types of sunglasses which reflects like a mirror on one side, and normal shades on the other. I understand that this is due to a coating of some mercury salt on the lens, but what is the exact physical explanation of this phenomenon?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
When you put a translucent coating on a surface, you have set two reflecting surfaces together: light can bounce from the original surface and also from the surface of the coating.

Think of what happens at the surface of the coating: light bouncing from it is now accompanied by light coming back after bouncing off the glass.

Now you need to remember that light behaves like a wave, and notice that, if these two outgoing beams (the one reflected here, and the one coming back from reflection on the original, deeper, surface) are in phase (valleys with valleys), then they add up. On the other hand, if they are in opposite phases (highs on lows), they will cancel, hence producing no reflected beam.

So, all you have to do is get the coating to be just right (in terms of refraction index and thickness) to produce the desired effect.
 
The explanation is simple. A reflective coating is applied to one side, but the coating is so thin that some light is still transmitted. I've done this myself when I was a grad student: i evaporated gold onto the outer surface of my prescription glasses.

How thin must the coating be? Remember that metals conduct electricity. Light waves consist of oscillating electric and magnetic fields. The metal effectively shorts out the electric field, but if the frequency is high enough, the electrons cannot move fast enough. This is expressed in a quantity known as skin depth - the depth of penetration of the light waves into a conducter. Skin depth, and hence the required thickness of metallic coating for sunglasses, is a few nanometres for light frequencies in the visible range.
 


ahrkron said:
When you put a translucent coating on a surface, you have set two reflecting surfaces together: light can bounce from the original surface and also from the surface of the coating.

Think of what happens at the surface of the coating: light bouncing from it is now accompanied by light coming back after bouncing off the glass.

Now you need to remember that light behaves like a wave, and notice that, if these two outgoing beams (the one reflected here, and the one coming back from reflection on the original, deeper, surface) are in phase (valleys with valleys), then they add up. On the other hand, if they are in opposite phases (highs on lows), they will cancel, hence producing no reflected beam.

So, all you have to do is get the coating to be just right (in terms of refraction index and thickness) to produce the desired effect.

krab said:
The explanation is simple. A reflective coating is applied to one side, but the coating is so thin that some light is still transmitted. I've done this myself when I was a grad student: i evaporated gold onto the outer surface of my prescription glasses.

How thin must the coating be? Remember that metals conduct electricity. Light waves consist of oscillating electric and magnetic fields. The metal effectively shorts out the electric field, but if the frequency is high enough, the electrons cannot move fast enough. This is expressed in a quantity known as skin depth - the depth of penetration of the light waves into a conducter. Skin depth, and hence the required thickness of metallic coating for sunglasses, is a few nanometres for light frequencies in the visible range.

Hi...
Great explanations by you.
Can you tell how much thickness is to be considered for the coating, so that the coating doesn't conduct the electric field..
Thank you...

http://sheinman.com/sunglasses/58_Oakley_FIVES.asp
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K