What is the difference in the shown waveforms conceptually?by dexterdev Tags: conceptually, difference, shown, waveforms 

#1
Jul1513, 01:08 AM

P: 190

Hi guys ,
My present doubt is regarding the waveforms shown in the image. The first plot is a impulse train. what is the difference having δ(t) in one plot and 1 at t=0, (0 else where) in a second case. whether time or frequency is the case... 



#2
Jul1513, 02:18 AM

Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
PF Gold
P: 10,925

In the second one, at t=0, f(t)=1. In the first one, f(t=0) is undefined. It will probably help you understand if you consider the situations you'd have to find the area under the train in each case ... or do a fourier transform. 



#3
Jul1513, 03:48 AM

P: 190

Sir , thanks for the eye opener............ But how does this concept do apply practically.........for example when viewing spectrum analyzer of a periodic signal, the frequency domain we see is what mathematically?Is it impulse functions or spikes...? How do we treat this impulses practically?




#4
Jul2713, 06:45 AM

P: 1,270

What is the difference in the shown waveforms conceptually?
A spectrum analyser cannot represent infinite pulses of zero width so we see each as a limited amplitude pulse with an area determined by energy. A train of Dirac delta pulses is a Dirac comb.
The spectrum of a Dirac comb is itself a Dirac comb. Take a look at... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_comb 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Friction  conceptually confused!  Introductory Physics Homework  5  
Understanding math conceptually.  General Math  10  
rotations conceptually  General Math  1  
thinking conceptually about QM  Advanced Physics Homework  1 