Proof Derivatives of sec^2x: 2sec^3x*sinx

  • Thread starter Thread starter gordda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivatives Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the derivative of the function sec²x, with a specific claim that the derivative is 2sec³x*sinx. Participants are exploring differentiation techniques in calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the applicability of the product rule and quotient rule for differentiation. Some express uncertainty about the chain rule's relevance, questioning whether sec²x qualifies as a function within a function. Others suggest using the chain rule by breaking down sec²x into components.

Discussion Status

There is an active exploration of different differentiation methods, with participants providing insights into the use of the product and chain rules. Some guidance has been offered regarding the differentiation process, but no consensus has been reached on the correctness of the original claim.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating a homework problem with specific constraints, including the requirement to prove a derivative, which may influence their approach and reasoning.

gordda
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
hi, new to this site.
i was given this question on a recent test and not quite sure if i got it right.
it was:

prove the derivatives of sec^2x is 2sec^3x*sinx.

i wasn't really sure of the answer. so if anyone could help out, it would be much appreciated.
thanx :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i didn't know to use the quotient rule or the product rule first.
 
Do you know the chain rule? If so, it should be easy.

If not, I'd probably use the product rule first:

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}\sec^2{x} = \sec x \frac{d}{dx}\sec x \; + \; \sec x \frac{d}{dx}\sec x = 2 \sec x \frac{d}{dx} \sec x[/tex]

and from there, you can rewrite it as

[tex]2 \sec x \frac{d}{dx} \frac{1}{\cos x}[/tex]

and use the quotient rule.

There are many other ways to do it, of course, and you could do it by using the quotient rule first if you felt like it.
 
Last edited:
I get the product/ quotient rule. but with the chian rule doesn't have to be a function within a function. sec^2x isn't a function within a function is it?
 
Let

[tex]f(x) = x^2[/tex]

[tex]g(x) = \sec x.[/tex]

Then

[tex]\sec^2 x = f(g(x))[/tex]

:smile:

of course, you still have to differentiate [itex]\sec[/itex]~

You can do that using the chain rule too if you want. Let

[tex]h(x) = \frac{1}{x}[/tex]

and

[tex]u(x) = \cos x.[/tex]

Then

[tex]\sec x = h(u(x)).[/tex]

In fact, you can just write

[tex]\sec^2 x = f(h(u(x)))[/tex]

and 'peel back the layers' with the chain rule, if you want to.
 
Last edited:
gordda said:
hi, new to this site.
i was given this question on a recent test and not quite sure if i got it right.
it was:

prove the derivatives of sec^2x is 2sec^3x*sinx.

i wasn't really sure of the answer. so if anyone could help out, it would be much appreciated.
thanx :)
Here's the "Chain Rule" method:
(d/dx){sec^2(x)} = 2*{sec(x)}*(d/dx){sec(x)} =
= 2*{sec(x)}*(d/dx){cos^(-1)(x)} =
= 2*{sec(x)}*{(-1)*cos^(-2)(x)}*(d/dx){cos(x)} =
= 2*{sec(x)}*{(-1)*cos^(-2)(x)}*{(-1)*sin(x)} =
= 2*{sec(x)}*{(-1)*sec^(2)(x)}*{(-1)*sin(x)} =
= 2*{sec^3(x)}*{sin(x)}

~~
 
Last edited:
i sort of get it. but i think i would use the product rule to derive the question.
thanx for the help i can now sleep at night even though i know i got the question wrong :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K