Can you prove that this set is countable?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nylex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Sets
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the set of natural numbers not divisible by 3 is countable. Participants explore various approaches to establish a suitable mapping to or from the natural numbers, addressing both the need for a bijection and the implications of countability.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests a hint for proving that the set of natural numbers not divisible by 3 is countable by providing a suitable map.
  • Another participant questions the notation used, seeking clarification on the meaning of symbols like E and Z in the context of natural numbers.
  • A clarification is made regarding the notation, indicating that N refers to the set of natural numbers and nEN means 'n is an element of N'.
  • One participant suggests that the set of natural numbers not divisible by 3 is an infinite subset of the naturals and thus countably infinite, implying a bijection exists without explicitly providing one.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the question explicitly asks for a suitable map as part of the proof.
  • A proposed mapping is presented, where natural numbers not divisible by 3 are expressed in terms of two distinct forms (3n-1 and 3n-2) based on whether n is even or odd, with a function defined to demonstrate this mapping.
  • A participant asks for a proof that the proposed function is a bijection.
  • Another participant states that since the set in question is a subset of the naturals, it is countable, referencing a theorem that any subset of a countable set is also countable, suggesting that a bijection is not necessary to demonstrate countability.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of providing a bijection to prove countability. While some argue that a bijection is required, others contend that the set being a subset of the naturals suffices to establish countability without one.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the notation used and the clarity of the original problem statement. Additionally, the discussion reflects varying levels of mathematical sophistication among participants.

Nylex
Messages
552
Reaction score
2
hi there

i just need a hint for this question please :

By giving a suitable map to or from N (thats a natural number N) proving that the set
{nEN | n is not divisible by 3}

thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry, that doesn't make sense. What does E mean? What does nEN mean? Since N is apparently a natural number, I mean, rather than the set of natural numbers, what's Z? the integers?
 
im sorry maybe i didnt make myself clear enough

the N i am taking as the 'chalkboard' N used to signify the naturals
nEN meaning 'n' is an element of N
 
So, you're statement is

[tex]\{ n \in \mathbb{N}\ Z : n \notin 3\mathbb{N} \}[/tex]

still what does that Z signify? And filling in, (you ask us to prove something but don't state what exactly), are you're asking for an explicit bijection between the naturals and the set of naturals not divisible by 3? I only ask as there is no need to write down a bijection. The set is an infinite subset of the Naturals and is thus countably infinite, hence in bijection with N.
 
sorry the Z was a typo.

the question explicitly asks for a suitable map as part of the proof
 
OK. The map is, as always in these questions, since the set in question is a subset of N, we can order its elements using the ordering of N:

x(1) < x(2) <x(3)

since the subset is not finite, this produces an infinite string indexed by N. The map

n ---> x(n)

is a bijection from N to the subset in question.
 
matt grime's method surely works. Perhaps because I am not a "mathematically sophisticated" as he is, I didn't think of doing it that way. What I did was think, "All natural numbers that are NOT divisible by 3 are of the form 3n-1 and 3n- 2 (for n a positive integer). Since those are two distinct sets let's try mapping even numbers into one and odd numbers into the other:

If m is even, f(m)= 3(m/2)- 1, if m is odd, f(m)= 3((m+1)/2)- 2.
That means f(1)= 3((1+1)/2)- 2= 1, f(2)= 3(2/2)-1= 2, f(3)= 3((3+1)/2)-2= 4,
f(4)= 3(4/2)-1= 5, f(5)= 3((5+1)/2)- 2= 7, etc. Seems to work!

Nylex, can you prove that f is a bijection?
 
If a set A is countable than any subset B of a countable set will also be countable (theorem). The set you are descrbing is a subset of the naturals, and therefore countable. You have the set N/{3,6,9,12,15,...} which is a subset of the naturals and therefore countable. There is no need to find a bijection to show that the set is countable if you don't have to.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
11K