We know e (exponential) is a irrational number

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the proof of the irrationality of the number e (the base of the natural logarithm). Participants explore various methods and arguments related to this mathematical concept, including comparisons to the irrationality of π and the use of infinite series and Taylor expansions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the calculation of e can be likened to that of π, proposing that an infinite series of non-repeating rational numbers implies irrationality.
  • Another participant questions the possibility of proving that the digits in the decimal expansion of e are non-repeating, suggesting that it may be easier to show that e cannot be expressed as a fraction.
  • A method involving Taylor's series is presented, indicating that if e can be expressed as a fraction with a denominator j, it leads to a contradiction.
  • A theorem is mentioned that could be applied to show that if ln(c) is rational for a positive number c (not equal to 1), then c must be irrational, which is used to argue that e is irrational.
  • One participant challenges the clarity of a specific mathematical argument regarding the sum of an infinite sequence and its potential to equal an integer.
  • A proof involving the sequence An=1+1/2!+...+1/n! is discussed, with a detailed argument presented that leads to the conclusion that e cannot be rational.
  • Another participant expresses appreciation for the proof shared, noting a particular insight regarding the behavior of n! for large n.
  • Further discussion includes a reference to the Taylor remainder formula, with a participant indicating a desire to work through the details independently.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views and methods for proving the irrationality of e. There is no consensus on a single proof or method, and some arguments are challenged or questioned, indicating ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

Some arguments rely on specific mathematical assumptions and theorems that may not be universally accepted or fully resolved within the discussion. The proofs presented involve complex reasoning that may depend on the interpretation of infinite series and limits.

newton1
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
we know e (exponential) is a irrational number...
how can we prove it??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The way we calculate e can be similar to Pi.
One way yields an infinite series of non-repeating rational numbers. The sum is therefore irrational.

Try proving the sqrt(5) is irrational.
 
Emu, do you know of any way of proving directly that the digits in the decimal expansion of e are NOT repeating? I'm not saying it can't be done, only that I think it's easier to prove e cannot be written as a fraction.

One standard method is to use the Taylor's series (which may be what emu meant): e= 1+ 1/2 + 1/6+ ...+ 1/n!+ ...
If j is any positve integer then e*j!= integer+ 1/(q+1)+ 1/(q+1)(q+2)+ ... which is not an integer so e cannot be written as a fraction with denominator j for any j.

A theorem I saw years ago was this: If c> 0, and there exist a function f(x), continuous on [0,c], positive on (0,c) and such that f(x) and its iterated anti-derivatives can be taken to be integer valued at both 0 and c, the c is irrational!

Taking f(x)= sin(x) in this theorem shows that pi is irrational.

It can also be used to prove: If c is a positive number other than 1 and ln(c) is rational, then c is irrational.

Since e is a positive number, not equal to 1, and ln(e)= 1 is rational, it follows that e is irrational.
 
While e cannot be written as a fraction, e to its first 2 million decimal places can. I'm just not going to.
 
e*j!= integer+ 1/(q+1)+ 1/(q+1)(q+2)+ ... which is not an integer

That's not obvious... I don't see why the infinite sequence there cannot add up to an integral value.

Hurkyl
 
Let An=1+1/2!+...+1/n!;
It's quite simple to prove that 1/(n+1)!<e-An<1/(n!*n);
Let's suppose e is rational, so it's equal to p/q, where p and q are integers.
1/(n+1)!<e-(1+1/2!+...+1/n!)<1/(n!*n); | *n!;
1/(n+1)<n!*p/q-n!*(1+1/2!+...+1/n!)<1/n;
But between 1/(n+1) and 1/n is no integer...
n!*p/q must be an integer because for n big enough n! is a multiple of q;
So e is not rational...
QED
 
that's kind of a neat prove, thanks for posting it. I don't think I would've caught that last part about for n big enough...
 
thank you...:)
 
  • #10
e-An<1/(n!*n)

That bit isn't obvious either... but the ordinary taylor remainder formula gives e/(n+1)! for that term which is sufficient for the proof. Don't tell me how to get that end of the inequality, it'd be a good exercise to figure it out myself!

Hurkyl
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K