Does this limit exist lim e^(r^2)/(cos(t)sin(t)) for (r,t)->(0,0)

  • Thread starter Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit lim (r,t)→(0,0) (e^(r^2))/(cos(t)sin(t)) does not exist due to the denominator approaching zero while the numerator approaches one, leading to an undefined expression. The reasoning that both components grow without bounds is insufficient for determining limit existence; the overall behavior must be analyzed. In contrast, the limit lim (x,y)→(0,0) (sin(xy))/(xy) can be evaluated correctly by substituting xy=u, resulting in a limit of 1, confirming that it exists.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multivariable limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with the behavior of trigonometric functions near zero
  • Knowledge of substitution techniques in limit evaluation
  • Concept of oscillatory behavior in functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of oscillatory limits in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about the epsilon-delta definition of limits
  • Explore advanced limit evaluation techniques, including polar coordinates
  • Investigate the implications of undefined expressions in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on multivariable limits, as well as educators seeking to clarify limit evaluation techniques.

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
In my exam the question was to determine the existence of this limit
[tex]\lim_{(r,t)\rightarrow(0,0)} \frac{e^{r^2}}{\cos{t}\sin{t}}[/tex]

now i wrote the numerator has no t associated with it so grows or shrinks without bounds, the same applies for the denominator...
so the limit does not exist

is this a good reason

another question was
[tex]\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow(0,0)} \frac{\sin{xy}}{xy}[/tex]
i substituted xy = u and got [tex]\lim_{u \rightarrow 0} \frac{\sin{u}}{u} = 1[/tex]


is this the correct method?
Am i right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The numerator does not "grow or shrink without bound". As r goes to 0, the numerator goes to 1.

However, you are correct that the denominator goes to 0 as t does no matter what r is. Since the numerator goes to 1, what does that tell you about the fraction?

I was a bit suspicious about your second method, but yes, it works, since u is a variable, you are not assuming any relationship between x and y.
 


Your reasoning for the first limit is not entirely correct. While it is true that the numerator and denominator both grow without bounds as (r,t) approaches (0,0), this does not necessarily mean that the limit does not exist. In order to determine the existence of a limit, you need to consider the behavior of the function as a whole, not just the individual components. In this case, as (r,t) approaches (0,0), the function becomes oscillatory, with the numerator and denominator both approaching 0. This type of behavior can lead to the existence of a limit. However, in this case, the function is not well-defined at (0,0) since the denominator becomes 0, so the limit does not exist.

Your approach for the second limit is correct. By substituting xy=u, you are essentially reducing the problem to a single variable limit, which can be evaluated using standard techniques. In this case, the limit evaluates to 1, so you are correct in saying that the limit exists and is equal to 1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K