Register to reply

Proof of Blochs function.

by silverwhale
Tags: blochs, function, proof
Share this thread:
Oct4-13, 05:08 AM
P: 64
Hi Everybody,

I am learning solid state physics and read today through Kittel. I am still stuck at the proof of Blochs theorem i.e. the proof of Blochs function.

For the Schrodinger equation of a periodic potential the general ansatz:

[tex] \psi = \sum_k C_k e^{ikr} [/tex]

is made.

Then, by looking at the Schrodinger equation in the reciprocal lattice, we see that the [itex] C_k [/itex] are a linear combination of [itex] C_{k-G} [/itex], where [itex]G[/itex] is the reciprocal lattice vector.

Finally, the wave function is indexed by an index [itex] k [/itex] and rewritten as:

[tex] \psi_k = \sum_G C_{k-G} e^{i(k-G)r}, [/tex]

where the sum goes now over G.

I have two questions:
1) How can we go from the sum over k to a sum over G?
2) Is [itex] \psi_k [/itex] the same function as [itex] \psi [/itex]? If so, why do we index it with k?

I hope this is clear enough, and I would be glad for ANY answer!! :)
I am searching for an ansatz for nearly a week now!!
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on
Interfaces within materials can be patterned as a means of controlling the properties of composites
A new, tunable device for spintronics
Researchers study gallium to design adjustable electronic components

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Proof about phi function Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Blochs theorem Quantum Physics 0
Set function proof Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 11
Function Proof . . . Precalculus Mathematics Homework 2
Proof of function General Math 4