|Apr14-05, 02:26 AM||#1|
the scalar field lagrangian
I have a question about a statement I've seen in many a Quantum Field Theory book (e.g. Zee). They say that the general form of the Lagrangian density for a scalar field, once two conditions are imposed:
(1) Lorentz invariance, and
(2) At most two time derivatives,
L = 1/2(d\phi)^2 - V(\phi)
where V(\phi) is a polynomial in \phi.
Why is this? I can understand how the conditions restrict the kinetic energy term to being what it is, but I don't understand why V has to be _polynomial_ in \phi.
|Apr14-05, 03:11 AM||#2|
The reason is dimensional analysis. The action must be dimensionless to be a lorentz invariant, so the lagrangian has to have dimension mass^4 .
So you can simply power count your fields to tabulate all renormalizable interactions. You've probably seen this before.. You know the spinor field has dimension 3/2, scalar fields dimension 1 etc
So for scalar fields you can only have a (phi)^3, or b phi^4 where a is dimension 1 and b is dimensionless.. Anything higher than that would lead to negative mass dimension coupling constants and a badly nonrenormalizable theory.
|Similar Threads for: the scalar field lagrangian|
|RS 1, massless scalar field, and sep of vars.||Beyond the Standard Model||6|
|scalar field and spin 1/2 field||Quantum Physics||7|
|scalar field||Calculus & Beyond Homework||4|
|Redefinition of a scalar field||Advanced Physics Homework||4|
|Finding an electric field from a scalar field||Introductory Physics Homework||3|