Register to reply

The scalar field lagrangian

by qft1
Tags: field, lagrangian, scalar
Share this thread:
Apr14-05, 02:26 AM
P: 1

I have a question about a statement I've seen in many a Quantum Field Theory book (e.g. Zee). They say that the general form of the Lagrangian density for a scalar field, once two conditions are imposed:
(1) Lorentz invariance, and
(2) At most two time derivatives,

L = 1/2(d\phi)^2 - V(\phi)

where V(\phi) is a polynomial in \phi.

Why is this? I can understand how the conditions restrict the kinetic energy term to being what it is, but I don't understand why V has to be _polynomial_ in \phi.
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on
Engineers develop new sensor to detect tiny individual nanoparticles
Tiny particles have big potential in debate over nuclear proliferation
Ray tracing and beyond
Apr14-05, 03:11 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 1,685
Good question.

The reason is dimensional analysis. The action must be dimensionless to be a lorentz invariant, so the lagrangian has to have dimension mass^4 .

So you can simply power count your fields to tabulate all renormalizable interactions. You've probably seen this before.. You know the spinor field has dimension 3/2, scalar fields dimension 1 etc

So for scalar fields you can only have a (phi)^3, or b phi^4 where a is dimension 1 and b is dimensionless.. Anything higher than that would lead to negative mass dimension coupling constants and a badly nonrenormalizable theory.
Apr14-05, 10:53 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 11,927
It's not a requirement for max.2 time-derivatives.Think about Weyl gravity.The Hamiltonian formalism can be externded to an arbitrary # of time derivatives in the "kinetic" term...


Register to reply

Related Discussions
RS 1, massless scalar field, and sep of vars. Beyond the Standard Model 6
Scalar field and spin 1/2 field Quantum Physics 7
Scalar field Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
Redefinition of a scalar field Advanced Physics Homework 4
Finding an electric field from a scalar field Introductory Physics Homework 3