What is the general form of the Lagrangian density for a scalar field?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The general form of the Lagrangian density for a scalar field, under the conditions of Lorentz invariance and a maximum of two time derivatives, is expressed as L = 1/2(dφ)² - V(φ), where V(φ) is a polynomial in φ. This polynomial requirement arises from dimensional analysis, ensuring that the action remains dimensionless and the Lagrangian possesses dimension mass⁴. Scalar fields can only include terms like (φ)³ or bφ⁴, where 'a' has dimension 1 and 'b' is dimensionless, to avoid nonrenormalizable theories.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory principles
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics
  • Knowledge of dimensional analysis in physics
  • Basic concepts of renormalization in quantum fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Lorentz invariance in field theories
  • Explore dimensional analysis techniques in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about renormalization and its significance in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the role of kinetic terms in Lagrangian formulations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in Quantum Field Theory, graduate students in theoretical physics, and researchers focusing on scalar field dynamics and renormalization techniques.

qft1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a question about a statement I've seen in many a Quantum Field Theory book (e.g. Zee). They say that the general form of the Lagrangian density for a scalar field, once two conditions are imposed:
(1) Lorentz invariance, and
(2) At most two time derivatives,
is:

L = 1/2(d\phi)^2 - V(\phi)

where V(\phi) is a polynomial in \phi.

Why is this? I can understand how the conditions restrict the kinetic energy term to being what it is, but I don't understand why V has to be _polynomial_ in \phi.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good question.

The reason is dimensional analysis. The action must be dimensionless to be a lorentz invariant, so the lagrangian has to have dimension mass^4 .

So you can simply power count your fields to tabulate all renormalizable interactions. You've probably seen this before.. You know the spinor field has dimension 3/2, scalar fields dimension 1 etc

So for scalar fields you can only have a (phi)^3, or b phi^4 where a is dimension 1 and b is dimensionless.. Anything higher than that would lead to negative mass dimension coupling constants and a badly nonrenormalizable theory.
 
It's not a requirement for max.2 time-derivatives.Think about Weyl gravity.The Hamiltonian formalism can be externded to an arbitrary # of time derivatives in the "kinetic" term...


Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K