What is the solution to limx-->0 (1/tan x)2 - 1/x2?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Zargawee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the limit calculation of the expression limx-->0 (1/tan x)2 - 1/x2. Participants explore various methods to evaluate this limit, including graphical analysis and series expansions, while addressing potential errors and clarifying approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant initially suggests that the limit appears to be -2/3 based on graphical analysis but seeks a formal solution.
  • Another participant recommends combining the fractions to simplify the limit expression.
  • A participant questions the initial claim of -2/3, noting that both squared terms in the limit become infinite as x approaches 0.
  • There is a correction regarding a typographical error in the expression, clarifying that the correct operation is subtraction.
  • A method involving the series expansion of cotangent is proposed, indicating that the squared expansion yields terms that lead to -2/3 when subtracted from 1/x2.
  • A participant expresses confusion about deriving the series expansion for cotangent and shares their unsuccessful attempts using Maclaurin and Taylor series.
  • Another participant explains that holding off on sending x to 0 allows for a clearer expansion of cot(x), leading to the correct terms needed for the limit calculation.
  • Participants express appreciation for the insights shared, particularly regarding the series expansion approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

While some participants agree on the limit being -2/3, there is no consensus on the methods used to arrive at this conclusion, and multiple approaches are discussed without resolution on the preferred method.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential challenges in deriving series expansions and the implications of undefined behavior at x=0, which may affect the limit evaluation.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and enthusiasts of calculus, particularly those interested in limit evaluations and series expansions, may find this discussion beneficial.

Zargawee
[SOLVED] Limits Question

Hello ,
I need some help with this, I can't find a way to solve it :
limx-->0 (1/tan x)2 - 1/x2

from it's graph , the result seems to be -2/3 , but still don't know how , please help
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Add the two fractions together (i.e. get a common denominator, etc)

Then the limit should be in a form you know how to handle.
 
From the looks of the problem (I assume x is real), you have 2 squares (therefore each positive) and each becomes infinite. How did you get -2/3?
 
Heh, I didn't even notice the typo; I presume the + is supposed to be a -.
 
I'm sorry , change the + sign to - ...
and , I really draw it on NuCalc , it seems like -2/3
 
Another neat way to do it would be convert (1/tanx)^2 to (cotx)^2. Then, square the series expansion of cotx. The only non-zero terms of the sqared expansion (as x->0) are 1/(x^2)-2/3. Subtracting 1/x^2 from this does indeed leave -2/3.

Njorl
 
Question for Njorl:

(I hope Zargawee doesn't mind my adding this question to his thread.)
Using Hurkyl's approach it takes a lot of differentiating, but it works. -2/3 is clearly the limit. But Njorl's way is VERY intriguing. Unfortunately it completely eludes me. How do you get that expansion for cot(x)?

Using the Maclaurin series for Cos and Sin and dividing doesn't work because there's always 0 in the denominator. So I tried doing a Maclaurin series for Cot, but that seems impossible since f(0)=∞.

So I tried to do a Taylor expansion for Cot around Π/4, & if I didn't screw that up, it starts off with:
1 - 2(x-Π/4)/1! + 4(x-Π/4)2/2! ...

The next term, I think, is zero, & I didn't go any further because it didn't look promising. Just looking at what I had already, besides all of the x-terms, there's a 1 + Π/2 + Π2/8 + ... . I don't see any -2/3 there, so that's obviously not the series you're looking at.

What's your secret?
 
Yes, expanding cot(x) x->0 will yield an undefined answer, but if you hold off sending x to 0, and leave it in its terms you get:

cot(x)=1/x-x/3-(x^3)/45-(higher powers of x)

Squaring the series above yields an interesting result. Since we know x will go to zero, we only need to keep terms in which x is raised to a power of zero or less. The first term multiplied by itself yields 1/(x^2). The first term times the second term yields -1/3, but, because it is a cross term, you have it twice, yielding -2/3. Any other terms multiplied together have x raised to a power greater than zero, so that when x->0 they disappear. The 1/(x^2) term would go to infinity, but in the problem at hand, we are subtracting exactly this term.

Njorl
 
Very cool.

Thanks, Njorl.
 
  • #10
Thanks, This really solved my question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K