Does Planet Weight Depend on Speed and Gravity?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter chetan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planets Weight
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether the weight of planets is influenced by their speed and gravity. Participants explore various aspects of this question, including the definitions of weight and mass, gravitational interactions, and how planets' speeds might affect their gravitational properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the inquiry pertains to the causes of a planet's weight, the weight of objects on the planet, or the measurement of a planet's weight.
  • There is a suggestion that the mass of a planet does not change with speed, but its potential energy could vary with changes in velocity.
  • One participant introduces the concept of gravitational interactions, such as the "slingshot" effect, which can alter a planet's speed significantly.
  • Another participant emphasizes the distinction between weight and mass, arguing that weight is a gravitational force that lacks meaning when discussing planets, while mass is the more relevant quantity.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexity of answers provided, with some suggesting that the question may not require advanced physics to address.
  • Participants discuss the presence of gravity in space, clarifying that gravitational forces exist between any two masses, even in regions considered "deep-space."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the relationship between a planet's weight, speed, and gravity. Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of weight and mass, as well as the relevance of gravitational interactions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity in definitions, particularly between weight and mass. There are also unresolved questions regarding the implications of speed on gravitational effects and the measurement of mass.

chetan
[SOLVED] Weight of planets

Does the weight of planets depend upon the speed of the planet and gravity ?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Originally posted by chetan
Does the weight of planets depend upon the speed of the planet and gravity ?

Just to make it clear, are you asking what causes a planet to have its weight, what causes things on the planet to have weight, or how we measure the weight of a planet?
 
Originally posted by chetan
Does the weight of planets depend upon the speed of the planet and gravity ?

hello Lurch and chetan, this is a thought-provoking question.
let's assume that chetan is asking if the MASS of a planet depends on the speed the planet is travelling

there are gravitational interactions that abruptly boost the speed of planets----the "slingshot" interaction with Jupiter for example can suddenly increase the speed of a small planet or asteroid to the extent that it leaves the solar system! We are lucky to have Jupiter where it is because it has "cleaned out" the inner solar system of many comet nuclei and stuff that could hit us, exactly by this "slingshot" effect.

So, imagine you are on a planet that suddenly gains a lot of speed. Does gravity get stronger? Interesting. thanks chetan for the idea
 


Originally posted by marcus
hello Lurch and chetan, this is a thought-provoking question.
let's assume that chetan is asking if the MASS of a planet depends on the speed the planet is travelling

there are gravitational interactions that abruptly boost the speed of planets----the "slingshot" interaction with Jupiter for example can suddenly increase the speed of a small planet or asteroid to the extent that it leaves the solar system! We are lucky to have Jupiter where it is because it has "cleaned out" the inner solar system of many comet nuclei and stuff that could hit us, exactly by this "slingshot" effect.

So, imagine you are on a planet that suddenly gains a lot of speed. Does gravity get stronger? Interesting. thanks chetan for the idea
A change in the "speed" of a planet, defined as one in orbit, would only cause it to spiral inward if V is lost, or move outward from the parent body if V is gained. Too much +V could change the orbit, or sling it completely away from an orbit.

The planet's "weight" (mass/density) would not change, but it's potential energy would change in direct proportion to the change in V2. But, if the V approaches what would be called "relativistic velocity", it is a whole new ball game. The only objects I know of at relativistic V's are Neutron stars orbiting each other or orbiting a BH, there may be others (astronomical "bodies"), not meaning particles.

EDIT:
But, Marcus (getting real), you already know that and more.
 
Last edited:
Last edited by a moderator:


Originally posted by LURCH
Just to make it clear, are you asking what causes a planet to have its weight, what causes things on the planet to have weight, or how we measure the weight of a planet?


How we measure the weight of a planet?
 
Click on the link I provided above.
 


Originally posted by chetan
How we measure the weight of a planet?
Maybe we need to get more basic. Weight and mass are not the same thing. Mass is defined as "A property of matter equal to the measure of an object's resistance to changes in either the speed or direction of its motion." Its essentially the quantity of matter in an object. (holding off on realtivity for the time being)

Weight is the gravitational force between two objects. Ie, I weigh 145 pound when placed on the Earth and the Earth weighs 145 pounds when placed on my feet. On the moon, I weigh about 22 pounds.

So you see, the "weight" of a planet is a concept without really any meaning. Physicists and astronomers only really concern themselves with the MASS of a planet.

So the answer to your question if you mean "how do we measure the mass of a plant?" is that you measure it from watching things orbit it.

Just an aside, I think some of those with more specific knowledge of physics (ie, knowing more than me) tend to look for a complicated answer in situations where it isn't warranted. This appears to me to be a basic question not needing any of the high end complexities that can be applied.
 
Last edited:


Originally posted by russ_watters
Just an aside, I think some of those with more specific knowledge of physics (ie, knowing more than me) tend to look for a complicated answer in situations where it isn't warranted. This appears to me to be a basic question not needing any of the high end complexities that can be applied. [/B]
Very good point we should all keep in mind.
 
  • #10
just so no ones confused, mv^2/r=GmM/r^2...g is gravity but i thought there was no gravity in space?
 
  • #11
Originally posted by hawaiidude
just so no ones confused, mv^2/r=GmM/r^2...g is gravity but i thought there was no gravity in space?
Sure there is. Its everywhere, even "deep-space" between galaxies, but there it would be very weak and would be "tugging" you from very many directions, seemingly randon.

Labguy
 
  • #12
Originally posted by hawaiidude
just so no ones confused, mv^2/r=GmM/r^2...g is gravity but i thought there was no gravity in space?
In the classical sense, space itself doesn't have "gravity" - gravity is a force between two bodies with mass (as the equation says). So that means ANY two bodies with mass ANYWHERE have a calculable gravitational attraction between them.

You are probably thinking about astronauts in orbit. In orbit, they still have a gravitational attraction to Earth and its only slightly lower than on the surface (a couple of percent). They just don't feel it because they are in freefall.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K