Solving System of Linear Equations: Where is the Mistake?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a system of linear equations using Cramer's Rule and matrix determinants. The original poster presents a system of equations and attempts to apply Cramer's Rule to find the solutions, expressing confusion over discrepancies in their results.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use Cramer's Rule after forming the system into matrix notation. They express uncertainty about their determinant calculation and the resulting solutions. Some participants question the determinant value and suggest alternative methods for verification.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying the determinant calculation, with some suggesting that the original poster reconsider their approach. There is a recognition of differing methods, such as using cofactors, but no consensus on a single solution path has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of confusion regarding the use of Cramer's Rule and an expressed lack of understanding of cofactors, indicating a potential gap in foundational knowledge that may affect the discussion.

Nylex
Messages
552
Reaction score
2
It won't work and I don't see what I'm doing wrong.

Find the solutions of the following system of linear equations:

x + 3y - z = 1
2x + y + 2z = 3
5x + z = 2

I put these into the form Ax = b, where

A = (1 3 -1)
(2 1 2 )
(5 0 1 )

x = (x)
(y)
(z)

b = (1)
(3)
(2)

I worked out det A = 20.

Cramer's rule says the solutions are given by:

x = (1/det A) | 1 3 -1 | => x = 1/10
| 3 1 2 |
| 2 0 1 |

y = (1/det A) | 1 1 -1 | => y = 9/10
| 2 3 2 |
| 5 2 1 |

z = (1/det A) | 1 3 1 | => z = 11/10
| 2 1 3 |
| 5 0 2 |

These solutions are wrong, where have I gone wrong?? Grr.

When I work out the answers algebraically, I get x = 1/5, y = 3/5 and z = 1. These are correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
det A is 30 not 20

marlon
 
If you are not limited to using Cramer's Rule, I always find that just computing the cofactors of the matrix is much easier... and also a good way to check if your Cramer's Rule method is correct.
 
marlon said:
det A is 30 not 20

marlon

ARGH, thank you.

Theelectricchild said:
If you are not limited to using Cramer's Rule, I always find that just computing the cofactors of the matrix is much easier... and also a good way to check if your Cramer's Rule method is correct.

I didn't understand cofactors :(.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
993
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K