Line Integrals (I'm missing something here)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating a line integral of a vector field \(\vec F(x,y) = \langle 3xy, 8y^2 \rangle\) along a curve defined by \(C: y = 8x^2\) from the point (0,0) to (1,8). The original poster expresses uncertainty about the evaluation process and seeks guidance on parameterization and understanding the concepts involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster considers checking if the vector field is conservative and reflects on using the fundamental theorem for line integrals. They express uncertainty about parameterizing the curve and seek insights on vector calculus. Other participants clarify notation and question the use of variables in the vector field's components.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the notation used for vectors and the implications of parameterization. Some guidance has been provided regarding the evaluation of the integral, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of confusion regarding notation and terminology, particularly in relation to vector representation and the use of dot products. The original poster has indicated a lack of familiarity with certain concepts in vector calculus, which may affect their understanding of the problem.

FrogPad
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
Ok the question is:

[tex]\vec F(x,y)=<3xy,8y^2>\,=3xy\,\hat i + 8y^2\,\hat j[/tex]
[tex]C: y=8x^2[/tex]
Where [tex]C[/tex] joins [tex](0,0)\,,\,(1,8)[/tex]

Evaluate [tex]\int_{C} \vec F \cdot d\vec r[/tex]

I'm unsure how to evaluate this. I really do not want just an answer, I want to know how to solve it.
My first thought was to check if it is conservative then I can simply let [tex]\vec r(t)[/tex] be a line between the point. Or, (if conservative) I could use the fundamental theorem for line integrals. But:

[tex]\frac{dP}{dy} \neq \frac{dQ}{dx}[/tex]

...so it is not conservative.

My last idea is that I need to paramterize [tex]y=8x^2[/tex] and this is where I get kind of shaky as far as my abilities with vector calculus. (We just started this chapter). So any insight on this problem, or parameterizing functions would be awesome. Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Frogpad,

I'm not familiar with the notation in your first equation. What does it mean?
 
its just some vector notation, it is the same thing as:

F(x,y) = 3*x*y (i) + 8*t^2 (j)

where i and j are the unit vectors in the x and y directions
 
He's just using pointed brackets instead of rounded ones to signify vectors. Okay, my question is, if the vector field F is only a function of x and y, why does its definition have t in one of the components?
 
Well that would be because I made an error!
hehe, sorry about that.
It is fixed now.
 
As far as I remember,

[tex]\int{F(x)\bullet d\vec{r} = \int{F(y(x))y'(x)dx}[/tex]

In case I translated it wrong, for us it was
[tex]\int{F\bullet dr} = \int F(r(t))r'(t) dt[/tex]
 
Ok. You want to take the dot product of F along this curve with the vector dr. So you can just evaluate the integral of

[tex]\int_0^1 \vec{F}(x, y = 8x^2)\cdot (dx\vec{i} + dy\vec{j})[/tex]

taking care to express dy as a function of x and dx.

What I have done here is I have set x to be the parameter.
 
Don't use that notation,please...It usually stands for inner product...


Daniel.
 
Who are you talking about?
 
  • #10
Wasn't it obvious i was referring to the vicious

[tex]\vec{F}\left(x,y\right)=\left\langle 3xy,8y^{2}\right\rangle[/tex] ?

Daniel.
 
  • #11
the < > notation
 
  • #12
it's easier to write, and I am lazy --- so naturally I am ok with your notation :D
 
  • #13
Ok wow, that was easy. Thanks guys.

Yeah my book is all about using <,> notation to refer to vectors. I usually just use a matrix represntation but I didn't want to spend the time looking up the latex formatting. Anyways, thanks for the help.
 
  • #14
Hmm,then your book doesn't treat vector and preHilbert spaces and uses the [itex]\cdot[/itex] notation for the (euclidean) scalar product.

Daniel.
 
  • #15
how big is your brain? seriously... does your neck hurt. :)
 
  • #16
BTW,the latex formatting is

[tex]\vec{F}=\left(F_{x},F_{y}\right)[/tex]

Not too much to look for.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
64
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K