Calculating Net Torque on a Circle with Multiple Forces

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster presents a problem involving the calculation of net torque on a circle with multiple forces applied. The discussion revolves around understanding torque and its units, as well as the contributions of different forces to the overall torque.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss their individual calculations of torque and question the implications of units, particularly the relationship between torque and energy. There is also a query about the relevance of a specific force that may not contribute to the torque.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of torque calculations and the significance of units. Some have provided their calculated values and reasoning, while others are questioning assumptions about forces that may not contribute to the net torque.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a specific force that is off the circle, raising questions about whether it should be considered in the torque calculations. Additionally, the discussion touches on the potential confusion surrounding the units of torque being the same as those for energy.

physicsCU
Messages
198
Reaction score
1
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have -0.94, provided the z axis points outward the computer screen.

By the way, what is the unit of torque?

[tex]\vec{\tau} = \vec{r}\times \vec{F}[/tex]

So it's N*m = J !

I realize that the N*m of torque is not the same kind of N*m as that the one involved in work, for exemple. The first speaks of Force exerted AT a distance, the second of a force exerted ON a distance. But the units remain N*m, and that's Joules! I'm thrown down my chair.
 
Last edited:
Torque is in N*m

Can I ask how you got that answer though?
 
But N*m is Joules. Don't you find that strange? I find that troubling.

I simply calculated all the torques and added them together:

-.10*30 + .5*30*sin(45°) + .5*20
 
I have accepted it, no worries.

But what about that force that is off the circle in the third quadrant? Do you ignore that, or what?
 
That last vector isn't doing any work to turn the circle, so its got no effect. Remember Torque is a cross prodcut between Force and Radius, the force is parallel to the radius, in which case sin(0)=0 and the vector applies no torque.
 
Quasar makes an interesting point however--- the concept of torque being measured in units of Nm ---> Joules? Energy?

It's best to keep your units of moments around a point in Nm, just as when one calculates the complex power for ckt elements under an sinusoidal steady state voltage or current... the real power (avg power) is measured in Watts, whereas the imaginary reactive power stays as VA (volt amps), rather than watts.
 
I read an article about that. I don't remember what the explanation was, but they said it made sense.
 
you might be correct.
 
  • #10
Anyway just to clarify, Torque is the turning effect, although it has the same units as Joules it's not energy, so it msut never be written in J, but N m.
 

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K