The Mystery of Frisbee Motion??

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter T@P
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Uniform
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the motion of frisbees, focusing on the effects of air pressure, spin, and shape on their flight. Participants explore concepts related to aerodynamics, including Bernoulli's principle, gyroscopic stability, and the influence of throwing techniques. The scope includes theoretical considerations and practical observations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that frisbees rely on air for flight and would not fly in a vacuum, with one noting they would fall under gravitational acceleration.
  • There is a suggestion that the spinning of the frisbee creates lower air pressure around it, which contributes to its ability to float and maintain stability.
  • One participant mentions that the frisbee's shape resembles an airfoil, leading to differences in pressure above and below it, although the exact mechanics are described as complex and debated.
  • Concerns are raised about the lack of a straightforward formula to predict frisbee motion based on rotation speed and initial force.
  • Some participants discuss the effects of throwing angles, noting that frisbees thrown upside down tend to fall quickly, while others argue that this does not clearly demonstrate the relationship between spin and pressure.
  • There are references to specific throwing techniques, such as the "bounce" trick, which some participants have not mastered.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the mechanics of frisbee flight, particularly concerning the role of spin, shape, and throwing technique. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on specific claims.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the relationship between frisbee motion and aerodynamic principles is complex and may depend on various factors, including angle of attack and throwing technique. Some assumptions about pressure and stability are not fully explored.

T@P
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
Ive been wondering how frisbee's move around since like 3 hours ago, and here's my take:

frisbees move specially only because of air, i.e. they don't fly as well in a vacuum.

but as to how they move, this is what i think. the firsbee spins, so everywhere near the frisbee there is lower air pressure (one of bernoulis laws i think. or something like that). however there is lower pressure all around it so all the forces sort of negate each other and it just floats with little air resistance because of that. (therefore the initial push pushes it better all the way throughout). the fact that its curved i believe will trap some air there, (the lower pressure will keep the air coming there, essentially a pillow of air). that's why they float...

is any of this right? or is it all some drivel i concocted?

thanks for the help

oh and there's something similar in it to a gyroscope - that's why they don't tilt as much.

??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
T@P said:
Ive been wondering how frisbee's move around since like 3 hours ago, and here's my take:

frisbees move specially only because of air, i.e. they don't fly as well in a vacuum.
They don't fly at all in a vacuum. They would drop with acceleration g.

but as to how they move, this is what i think. the firsbee spins, so everywhere near the frisbee there is lower air pressure (one of bernoulis laws i think. or something like that). however there is lower pressure all around it so all the forces sort of negate each other and it just floats with little air resistance because of that. (therefore the initial push pushes it better all the way throughout). the fact that its curved i believe will trap some air there, (the lower pressure will keep the air coming there, essentially a pillow of air). that's why they float...

oh and there's something similar in it to a gyroscope - that's why they don't tilt as much.
The frisbee spin makes it stable. But its shape makes it fly. It has the shape of an airfoil so there is lower pressure on top than below. Just how that occurs is not simple and is subject of much debate. It is not a simple Bernoulli principle.
See this thread
and this one

AM
 
so there's no nice formula, like input the speed it rotates at, and the initial force on it and you can calculate where it went?
 
I doubt it, especially with all the tricks one can do with frisbees -- for instance, you can throw it forward and have it land behind you, or throw it at a downward angle, and it will lift itself back up!
 
I'm pretty sure it's mainly that the spinning causes lower pressure. Because, if you throw a frisbee upside down, it hits the ground very quickly.
 
i tried it, and Ryan H is exactly right.

still, too bad. you can start a whole new area of physics, Uniform Frisbee Motion.

you can even expand it into hitting falling monkeys with frisbees, etc etc

lol
 
Ryan H said:
I'm pretty sure it's mainly that the spinning causes lower pressure. Because, if you throw a frisbee upside down, it hits the ground very quickly.
Your logic is not very clear. Why do you think B (if you throw a frisbee upside down, it hits the ground very quickly) implies A (the spinning causes lower pressure)?

AM
 
In my experience, frisbees thrown upside-down don't hit the ground "very quickly".
 
"Lift" depends on the shape of an airfoil, but it also depends on the angle of attack. The only fair comparison would be to throw two frisbies perfectly horizontally in still air, one upright and one upside down. An upside down frisbie thrown at an upward angle would get some lift from the attack angle.
 
  • #10
It may be explained because i try to throw my frisbees horizontally... I never mastered the 'bounce' trick, where it goes down and then back up without hitting t he ground.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K