Finite groups and order of their elements

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of finite groups, specifically focusing on a group of order 10 and the existence of elements of certain orders, namely 2 and 5. Participants explore various approaches to proving these properties, considering both cyclic and non-cyclic groups.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if the group is cyclic, the existence of elements of order 2 and 5 is trivial, but seeks to prove the case for non-cyclic groups.
  • Another participant proposes that if there are two elements of order 2, they can form a subgroup, questioning whether this subgroup property holds in non-abelian groups.
  • Some participants note that if all elements are of order 2, the group must be abelian, leading to the conclusion that a non-abelian group of order 10 must contain an element of order 5.
  • One participant challenges the assertion that a group can have an element of order 2 and an odd order, referencing Lagrange's theorem.
  • Another participant points out that the existence of an element of order 1 (the identity) does not support the claim that all other elements being of order 2 implies an odd order for the group.
  • One participant mentions using Cauchy's theorem to argue that a group of order 10 must have either an element of order 2 or an element of order 5, and discusses constructing a new group to demonstrate the impossibility of all elements having order 2.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of group properties, particularly regarding the relationship between element orders and group structure. There is no consensus on the best approach to proving the existence of an element of order 5 in a non-cyclic group of order 10.

Contextual Notes

Some arguments rely on assumptions about group properties that may not be universally applicable, and there are unresolved mathematical steps regarding subgroup formation and element orders.

Chen
Messages
976
Reaction score
1
Hi,

This time around I need to prove that a finite group of order 10 must contain an element of order 2 and an element of order 5.

If the group is cyclic then this is trivial. So assuming the group is not cyclic, it's easy to show that there exists an element of order 2 in the group. And it is just as trivial to show that any element, except for e, must be of either order 2 or order 5. But I'm having a hard time proving that there must be an element of order 5 in the group. I think I just need to show that it's impossible to have every element in the group be of order 2, only problem is I don't know how... I do know that if a group consists only of elements of order 2, then it must be abelian. So perhaps it would be just as good to show that a non-cyclic group of order 10 cannot be abelian?

I'd much appreciate hints and nudges in the right direction. :)

Chen
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I think I have an idea. Let's assume that there are two elements of order 2 in G, let them be a and b. If I can prove that the subset {e, a, b, ab, ba} forms a subgroup within G, I'm done. So is it? And is this a good idea?

Another thought: if G is abelian then it's easy to prove that that subset is indeed a subgroup. So now I solved the question for the case that G is abelian. Now how I do proceed from here, proving that it's also true if G is not abelian?

Got it. :smile:
 
Last edited:
Sometimes it's easier to solve a slightly more general problem.

[Nonsense]
There is always exactly one element of order 1 (the identity) in any group, so if all other elements are of order 2, then the order of the group must be odd.
[/Nonsense]
:redface:
 
Last edited:
Huh? How can a group contain an element of order 2 and have an odd order itself? Isn't that in contradiction with Lagrange's theorem?
 
I thought I posted an answer?

Anyway, if every element is of order 2 then G is abelian, but we know the abelian groups of order 10. There is exactly one of them. So, not abelian implies there is an element of order 5 (since all elements of order 2 implies abelian), and abelian implies the group is C_2xC_5, and again there is an element of order 5.
 
There is always exactly one element of order 1 (the identity) in any group, so if all other elements are of order 2, then the order of the group must be odd.

That doesn't follow. Take Z2 as a trivial counterexample.
 
Ack. I wrote A, but I meant B, while the answer is C.
I wanted to show that a finite group of even group always has an element of order 2, but it can't be used directly to show there has to be an element of order 5 in your case.

Sowry'bout that.
 
Thanks, matt. We've not studied this material yet, so I can't use that proof (and even if I could, I don't understand one bit of it :biggrin:). But thanks.
 
well what do youi know? certainly there is either an element of order 2 or an element of roder 5, by cauchy.

So if all elements have order 2, then G is abelian. Then take one of those elements, say x, and mod out by it. I.e. construct a new group of order 5, whose elements are all 5 pairs of form {y,yx} for all y in G. The product of the pair {y,yx} with {z,zx} is of course {yz,yzx}.

the fact this group has order 5 implies every y in G, except e and x, has order greater than 2.

so you cannot have a groupo of order 10 with all elements of order 2.


now suppose all elements have order 5, except e. then do something similar.




is it ok that
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K