Solving the Integral of sqrt(4x-1) | Math Help

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PrudensOptimus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the function sqrt(4x-1) with respect to x. Participants explore various methods of solving the integral, including u-substitution and direct integration techniques, while addressing common misconceptions and errors in the process.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose using u-substitution with u=4x-1 to simplify the integral.
  • Others argue that the integral can be approached directly by applying the power rule, although this leads to complications due to the composition of functions.
  • A participant mentions the need to convert from dx to du when using substitution, emphasizing the linearity of the function inside the square root.
  • Another participant suggests that integrating the expression as a sight integral can yield the correct result by factoring out the derivative of the inner function.
  • Some participants express confusion over the integration process and the necessity of including the derivative factor in the integral.
  • There are differing opinions on the efficiency of various methods, with some participants favoring traditional techniques while others advocate for newer approaches.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method to solve the integral, with multiple competing views on the approach and reasoning behind the integration process remaining unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that their understanding of integration techniques has evolved over time, indicating that familiarity with different methods may influence their perspectives on solving the integral.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students learning integration techniques, particularly those grappling with the nuances of integrating composite functions and the application of u-substitution.

PrudensOptimus
Messages
641
Reaction score
0
I try to take the integral of sqrt(4x-1) with respect to x...


The correct answer is sqrt((4x-1)^3)/6, but I always get

2sqrt((4x-1)^3)/3... Can someone explain how to solve that integral pls.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by PrudensOptimus
I try to take the integral of sqrt(4x-1) with respect to x...

OK

The correct answer is sqrt((4x-1)^3)/6,

No, it isn't.

Edit: My mistake; yes it is.

but I always get 2sqrt((4x-1)^3)/3...

That's not right either.

Can someone explain how to solve that integral pls.

Yes, you do a u-substitution. Let u=4x-1, so du=4dx. You then have:

(1/4)∫u1/2du,

which is elementary.
 
Last edited:
If you didn't understand what the last person said when you take the integral of squrt(4x-1) with respect to xdx you must first find u and u prime (or the derivative of u), where u is what is in the parentheses, in this case (4x-1) so u prime (or the derivative of (4x-1)) = 4x, but you still have to deal with the remaining x and the 4 left by the derivative. To get rid of the 4 in the derivative you divide the integral by 4, and subistute for the x so. x=(u-1)/4, I'm you understand the rest. You multiply u^(1/2)*((u-1)/4) then take the antiderivative of that.
 
The problem, by the way, is NOT the square root! You can easily integrate ∫ √(x) dx. √(x)= x1/2 and you can use the "power rule".
The problem is that "4x-1" inside the square root. To get rid of that you make the substitution mentioned earlier: u= 4x-1 so that
√(4x-1)= &radi;(u)= u1/2. Of course, you have to convert from "dx" to "du". Because 4x-1 is linear, that's easy
du/dx= 4 so du= 4 dx or (1/4)du= dx.

∫ &radic(4x-1)dx= (1/4)&int u1/2du.

The power rule says that an anti-derivative of un is
1/(n+1) un+1. In this case, n= 1/2 and n+1= 3/2. The anti-derivative is (2/3)u3/2+ C . Replacing u by 4x-1 again, ∫ &radic(4x-1)dx= (2/3)(4x-1)3/2+ C.

Since the original problem was given in terms of √ rather than a 1/2 power, it might be a good idea to set the answer in those terms: ∫ &radic(4x-1)dx= (2/3)(√(4x-1))3+ C.
 
Why can't you just int. the bracket like you would int. x^0.5?

Code:
∫ (4x-1)^0.5 dx

increase the power and divied by it:

(4x-1)^1.5 + c = 2(√(4x-1))^3 + c
----------       ------------
   1.5                3
 
Last edited:
Why can't you just int. the bracket like you would int. x^0.5?

Because if you differentiate your result ((2/3)(4x-1)^(3/2) + C) you get:

4(4x - 1)(1/2)

which is not what you integrated.
 
Originally posted by lavalamp
Why can't you just int. the bracket like you would int. x^0.5?

Code:
∫ (4x-1)^0.5 dx

increase the power and divied by it:

(4x-1)^1.5 + c = 2(√(4x-1))^3 + c
----------       ------------
   1.5                3

As Sting said, when you differentiate your result, you do not get the original integrand. That is because (4x-1)1/2 is a composition of functions.

f(u)=u1/2
u(x)=4x-1

In general, a composition of functions does not satisfy the same basic integration rule as the simple function f(u).

edit: typo
 
Sorry, I meant to integrate it as a sight integral, where a multiple of the differential of the bracket appears outside the bracket, ie:

∫ f'(x) * (f(x))^n dx

in this case f(x)=4x-1 and f'(x)=4. The mulitple in this case is 0.25 which you can take out of the integral and put it back in at the end to get the right answer:

Code:
1 * (4x-1)^1.5 + c = (√(4x-1))^3 + c
-   ----------       ------------
4      1.5                6
 
Lavalamp,
That's how I learned to do it, way back in '87. I think it's much quicker and easier.
Aaron
 
  • #10
I only learned about integration at the end of 2002, and then I only learned about sight integrals earlier this year. That's why I messed up the integration the first time round.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K