| Thread Closed |
time |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Apr18-05, 07:38 PM | #1 |
|
|
time
17:14, 12:01, 07:04, ?
|
| Apr18-05, 08:19 PM | #2 |
|
|
I don't know, maybe 12:11? Have you really given enough terms to figure this out?
|
| Apr18-05, 11:32 PM | #3 |
|
|
I can think of three legit answers.
|
| Apr18-05, 11:33 PM | #4 |
|
|
time
And They Are....?
|
| Apr18-05, 11:34 PM | #5 |
|
|
|
| Apr19-05, 04:42 PM | #6 |
|
|
They are specific times that have something in common. If you figure out the relationship between the first three, the last one will be apparent.
|
| Apr19-05, 05:33 PM | #7 |
|
|
Well, 01:32 works. It may not be the most simplest pattern, but it does work...
|
| Apr19-05, 07:30 PM | #8 |
|
|
You should realize that given any finite sequence of numbers, no matter how long the sequence is, and no matter what the numbers in the sequence are, you can give any number you want as the next number in the sequence and justify it. The way to do so is to produce a polynomial whose zeros are the numbers in the given sequence plus the one that you answered with. That having been said, I can justify the following answer based on a difference equation.
Answer whited out 02:23 |
| Apr20-05, 05:02 AM | #9 |
|
|
17:14, 12:01, 07:04, 02:10
|
| Apr20-05, 05:12 PM | #10 |
|
|
I think this is one of those "when you get the answer you'll know it" kind of puzzles.
The answer isn't merely arbitrary - i.e.: not merely an extrapolation from the given numbers. The answer will be obvious (once the logic is demonstrated). eg.: N S E ? There are many answers that could satisfy the pattern, but W is obviously the correct answer. |
| Apr26-05, 12:44 PM | #11 |
|
|
13:00 10:00 01:00 |
| Apr26-05, 03:06 PM | #12 |
|
|
17:14, 12:01, 07:04, 01:51
|
| Apr26-05, 03:55 PM | #13 |
|
|
Oblivion, are you still around?
|
| Apr26-05, 04:20 PM | #14 |
|
|
|
| Apr26-05, 06:12 PM | #15 |
|
|
solution:
02:00 because when they're seen on a digital watch they have 5:6,7:8,9:10,11:12 lines.(The smallest possible ones must be the solution.) or From the 1st set to the 3rd set, you replace the 1's with 0's. Following the same logic of replacing the 1's with 0's, going from the 2nd set to the 4th set you end up with 02:00. |
| Apr26-05, 06:46 PM | #16 |
|
|
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: time
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| is time, inside an event horizon, time-like or space-like? | Special & General Relativity | 34 | ||
| Is light travel time for event time calculation usually implicit? | Special & General Relativity | 5 | ||
| coherent time vs duration time of the wave packet (photon) | General Physics | 1 | ||
| Calculate time constant from the slope of dimensionless temperature vs time graph. | Introductory Physics Homework | 2 | ||
| since time slows down in a strong gravitational field, does time stop in a black hole | Special & General Relativity | 12 | ||