Register to reply

Deriving general cube roots

by AndyCav
Tags: cube, deriving, roots
Share this thread:
AndyCav
#1
Apr21-05, 10:57 AM
P: 7
I've been trying to derive general solutions for cubic roots, i.e. the general solutions of (will Latex just work?)

$ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0$

I do not want to be shown the solutions - but does anyone know what direction to go in to achieve this?

I thought I'd found solutions at one point but they relied on one of the solutions (the simplest in form) being $\sqrt{-c/a}$ and that doesn't appear to be true!

Andy
Phys.Org News Partner Mathematics news on Phys.org
Heat distributions help researchers to understand curved space
Professor quantifies how 'one thing leads to another'
Team announces construction of a formal computer-verified proof of the Kepler conjecture
AndyCav
#2
Apr21-05, 11:00 AM
P: 7
PS Anyone know how some peole are making Latex code work in their messages?
AndyCav
#3
Apr21-05, 11:04 AM
P: 7
[tex]x_{0}=\sqrt{\frac{-c}{a}}[/tex]

Ha ha, I appear to have found out!

AndyCav
#4
Apr21-05, 11:18 AM
P: 7
Deriving general cube roots

This is what I tried:

[tex]f(x)=ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0[/tex] is the general equation to solve, and intersects the y axis a distance d from the origin.

So, consider [tex]f(x-x_0)=g(x)[/tex] where [tex]x_0[/tex] is one solution of [tex]f(x)=0[/tex]. As we have shifted the original function along the x-axis the new function [tex]g(x)[/tex] now passes through the origin.

After substituting [tex]x-x_0[/tex] into f to get g, expand g to get it in the form [tex]g(x)=px^3+qx^2+rx+s[/tex]. As said above g passes through the origin so that s=0.

Therefore, [tex]s=0=d-ax_0^3+bx_0^2-cx_0[/tex]. Rearranging for d in terms of [tex]x_0[/tex] and a, b and c and substituting back into the original form for f we get [tex]f(x)=a(x^3-x_0^3)+b(x^2-x_0^2)+c(x-x_0)[/tex].

Now, as [tex]x_0[/tex] is by definition a solution of f; [tex]f(x_0)=0[/tex] we get:

[tex]ax_0^3+cx_0=0[/tex] which gives the trivial solution [tex]x_0=0[/tex] (i.e. d=0) and the two solutions

[tex]x_0=+-\sqrt{\frac{-c}{a}}[/tex].


These don't seem to work. Am I doing something stupid?

Andy
AndyCav
#5
Apr21-05, 11:26 AM
P: 7
There's meant to be a sqaure root sign over that -c/a but it's not coming out on my screen.

[tex]x_0[/tex] is of course just one solution of the cubic.
CRGreathouse
#6
Apr21-05, 11:34 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 3,684
If you have one solution [tex]x_0[/tex] to the cubic, you can just divide by [tex]x-x_0[/tex] to reduce it to a quadratic and you're done.

If you really want a general solution like Cardanno's, I think the first step would be to remove the [tex]bx^2[/tex] term by a change of variable.
AndyCav
#7
Apr21-05, 12:28 PM
P: 7
Well I'm trying to derive all solutions generally so I don't have [tex]x_0[/tex] to begin with. That's a fantastic idea about the change of variable to remove the even term though....! Cheers! I'll have dinner then have another try.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Modular cube roots Linear & Abstract Algebra 14
Calculating cube roots General Math 16
Cube roots Precalculus Mathematics Homework 13
'Euler criterion' for cube roots? Linear & Abstract Algebra 1
Cube roots Calculus & Beyond Homework 11