Falling flowerpotstuck on simple part

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rockdog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics of a 3.2 kg flowerpot dropped from a height, analyzing the forces and motions involved. The force acting on the pot after 1.5 seconds is calculated to be 31.36 N, with a speed of 23.4 m/s after falling 28 m. Upon entering a viscous liquid, the pot experiences a deceleration of 182 m/s², leading to a force exerted on the liquid of 582.4 N in the opposite direction of motion. The distinction between gravitational force and net force during deceleration is emphasized for clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Basic knowledge of kinematics and dynamics
  • Familiarity with force calculations using F=ma
  • Concept of deceleration in viscous mediums
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Newton's second law in-depth
  • Explore kinematic equations for objects in free fall
  • Learn about forces in viscous fluids and their effects on motion
  • Investigate real-world applications of deceleration in fluid dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of falling objects and forces in fluids.

Rockdog
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
A 3.2 kg flowerpot drops from a tall building. The initial speed of the pot is zero, and you may neglect air resistance.

a) What is the magnitude of the force acting on the pot while it is in the air 1.5 s after it begins to fall?

b) After the pot has fallen 28 m, what is its speed?

c) After the pot has fallen 28 m, it enters a viscous liquid, which brings it to rest over a distance of 1.5 m. Assuming constant deceleration over this distance, what is the magnitude of this deceleration?

d) What is the force exerted on the liquid by the pot?

-----------------------------------------------------------
Okay, I got the answers for the first three, which are
1) 31.36 N
2) 23.4 m/s
3) 182 m/s/s

If you really want to know how I did it, I can provide that in a later post, but that's not the point here.

I'm stuck on the last question.
I know I have to use this equation; F=M*a (in the y direction)
Well, I was thinking, the object has a downward force of 31.36 N, so when it hits the liquid, shouldn't the liquid push back up 31.36N? Of course, my answer doesn't match the computer, so insight appreciated.

*31.36N achieved by 3.2kg*9.8m/s/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The object does not have a downward force of 31.36 N... gravity is applying a 31.36 N downward force to the object. (I'm not sure if you know the distinction, so I'm stating it to be on the safe side)



You know the acceleration experienced by the object. You know the mass of the object. Thus, you know the net force acting on the object! (If the net force was 0, your reasoning would be correct in spirit... but the object is decelerating so the net force is not 0!)

There are two contributions to the net force; the 31.36 N downward force supplied by gravity, and the unknown force supplied by the liquid, and these have to add up to the net force.

Once you know the force with which the liquid acts upon the pot, then the negative of that is the force with which the pot acts upon the liquid.
 
=31.36N*

For the last question, you are correct in using the equation F=ma. However, you have to consider the direction of the force and acceleration. The force acting on the liquid by the pot is in the opposite direction of the pot's motion, so it would be a negative value. Also, the acceleration of the pot in the viscous liquid is not the same as its acceleration due to gravity. It is decelerating, so the acceleration would be negative as well.

To find the force exerted on the liquid by the pot, we can use the equation F=ma, where m is the mass of the pot and a is the deceleration of the pot in the liquid. So, it would be F=3.2kg*(-182m/s^2) = -582.4 N. This means that the liquid is exerting a force of 582.4 N in the opposite direction of the pot's motion, causing it to decelerate and eventually come to a stop over a distance of 1.5 m.

I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any other questions.
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K