Register to reply 
Summing divergences and the real projective line 
Share this thread: 
#1
Dec1313, 01:18 AM

P: 38

The real projective line states that there is not difference between positive and negative infinity (maybe except the path needed to be taken to "reach" either one of them) and they are actually connected.
There are a lot of ways to get a definite sum from a divergent series; one of which is the algebraic way (my personal favorite). note:j(x)=x^0+x^1+x^2+x^3+... Using the algebraic method I could derive the sum of j(2) as shown below: j(2)=1+2+4+8+16+... j(2)=1+2j(2) j(2)= 1= 1+2+4+8+16+... Does this mean that j(2) diverges so much that it went pass infinity from the positive side and landed on a definite negative point?  If the statement above is true, then the idea of < and > falls apart. Example:j(2)+j(1/2)1=0 ( the extra 1 here is to account for the (1/2)^0 ) A sum of all positive numbers that equals 0. A notion of < and > that would work in this scenario is by measuring how far it "moved" in the RPL. j(2)+j(1/2)1 "moved" and circled back to 0, but 0 never "moved".  j(4)=1+4+16+64+256+... j(2)=1+2+4+8+16+32+64+128+256...=(1+2)+(4+8)+(16+32)+(64+128)+... j(2)=3+12+48+192+...=3(1+4+16+64+...) j(2)=3j(4) S2:={1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128,...} S4:={1,4,16,64,256,...} S2\S4={2,8,32,128,...} which is S4 multiplied by 2 elementwise S2S4=2(S4) (treat it like a sum) S2=3(S4) Does this also mean that in j(x), the smaller x (x>=1), the bigger* it is. Bigger* meaning it "moved" more. 


#2
Dec1313, 09:31 AM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 4,500

We actually had a similar thread here already not too long ago
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=727863 Basically the moral of the story is that you shouldn't take the results of manipulating divergent series too seriously. 


#3
Dec1313, 10:31 AM

P: 471

In this space, there is no "positive" infinity or "negative" infinity. There are not two points to differentiate. There is one new point. Saying that this point is different from itself in some way is ridiculous. Maybe you mean that this new ordering doesn't "play with" addition on the real projective line the same way the old ordering did on the real line. But regardless of where you put ∞ in this ordering, under the usual assignment of a+∞=∞ the theorems involving order and addition are still true. So this is really about how your infinite addition interacts with the ordering. Again, until you tell us what infinite addition is, we can't confirm any observation regarding how the order is broken. 


#4
Dec1313, 08:59 PM

P: 38

Summing divergences and the real projective line
This method assumes a lot of things about infinite sums; namely that this one in particular is a number and that all of the algebraic properties of finite addition and multiplication can be extended to infinite addition, whatever the hell that is. Since you haven't stipulated what infinite addition is nor why we should accept the aforementioned assumptions, there is no way to tell what your result "means". And yes infinite operations are still very shady. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
1^∞, 0^0 and others on the real projective line  General Math  34  
Convexity in the real projective plane?  Differential Geometry  2  
Real projective plane  Differential Geometry  2  
The Real Line  Introductory Physics Homework  4  
Real line is used to mean real axis  General Physics  3 