Intensity and Relative Amplitude

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating intensity using relative amplitude in the context of musical instruments, specifically focusing on the harmonics and overtones of a violin. Participants explore concepts related to sound, timbre, and the physical characteristics that contribute to the unique qualities of different instruments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about calculating intensity using relative amplitude for a violin's harmonics or overtones.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the term "relative amplitude" and expresses concern about the discussion potentially leading to Fourier analysis.
  • A participant explains that different instruments produce similar frequencies but have varying relative amplitudes, which contribute to their distinct timbre.
  • It is suggested that the tonal qualities of instruments arise from the shapes of their waveforms rather than their amplitudes, which are merely measures of volume.
  • A participant elaborates on timbre being defined by "spectral content," noting that adding harmonics can enhance the richness of a sound while maintaining the fundamental note as the loudest component.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about calculating the harmonic content of a violin due to the complexity of its resonant system, suggesting that simple cavity resonance analysis may not capture all intricacies.
  • Another participant mentions that the fundamental frequency does not have to be the loudest, just the lowest, and discusses the nonlinear nature of a piano's spectrum, indicating limitations of Fourier analysis in describing timbre.
  • A participant highlights the significant role of the bow in creating the sawtooth waveform of a violin's sound, emphasizing its impact on the instrument's spectrum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between amplitude and timbre, as well as the complexity of calculating harmonic content in instruments like the violin. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of musical instrument acoustics, including the influence of physical characteristics such as the shape of the resonant cavity and the method of sound production (e.g., bowing). There are also references to the limitations of Fourier analysis in capturing the nuances of timbre.

yahooid2
How would you calculate the intensity using relative amplitude.

Say for a violin...how would you calculate it's intensity for one of it's harmonics or overtones.
 
Science news on Phys.org
What dou you mean by "relative amplitude"?

I hope this doesn't turn into a Fourier discussion..

Jonathan
 
like say in a wave...a musical note will create a similar frequency in different instruments, but the relative amplitude differs from instrument to instrument creating a different timbre or tone.
 
The tonal qualties of different instrumnets come from the different shapes of their waveforms not from their amplitudes (the amplitude of a note is merely a measure of it's volume).
 
To add to what jcsd said, the timbre of an instrument is defined by its "spectral content."

Think about this: a very boring instrument might play a single, pure sine wave of one frequency. The sound is bland and featureless, and won't impress most audiences.

Now add a little second harmonic -- in other words, if the basic note is middle C, add a little of the C one octave up. Be careful not to add too much -- the middle C should still be the loudest component. This new sound is a little more pleasing -- you can still tell it's a middle C, since the component with the largest amplitude is middle C -- but now the sound has a different timbre.

Real musical instruments have spectral content all over the place -- mostly in harmonics. The loudest note is called the fundamental, and notes of twice, three times, and four times that frequency are called the second, third, and fourth harmonics, and so on. Real instruments' sounds are defined by the amplitudes of all those harmonics -- they're often called "overtones" by musicians. That's why a saxophone and a piano sound very different, even when they both play middle C.

- Warren
 
And to answer your question, I'm not sure there's really any way to calculate the harmonic content of a violin, for example -- it's a complicated system. The shape of the resonant cavity, the vents, the bridge, etc. all come into play. You might be able to get a first approximation by just analyzing the resonance of a simple cavity, but it won't capture all the complexity that makes a real violin sound so nice.

- Warren
 
A pure sinusoid sounds cool, kind of eerie.

The fundamental does NOT have to be the loudest, just the lowest.

The spectrum of a piano is nonlinear (meaning Fourier analysis doesn't work well to describe the timbre).

The most important feature of a violin that causes the spectrum is the bow. The wave is predominantly sawtooth, and it doesn't require a terribly faithful reconstruction to simulate. The sawtooth is caused by the bow grabbing the string, pulling it, and then letting go sharply.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K