Register to reply

Born rule and Feynman propagators

by johne1618
Tags: born, feynman, propagators, rule
Share this thread:
Jan8-14, 03:10 PM
P: 373
Let us assume that we want to describe the full process of photon emission by electron A and absorption by electron B.

Therefore electron B must be on the forward lightcone of electron A.

In the normal forwards in time description a virtual photon propagates from A to B depositing a certain amount of energy and momentum onto electron B.

But does this process alone also describe the recoil of electron A?

Should one also include the backwards-in-time virtual photon which propagates from B to A depositing an equal amount of negative energy and momentum onto electron A?

One could say that the product of the forward-in-time and backward-in-time propagators give the full probability of photon emission by A and absorption by B.

Is this where the Born rule comes from?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on
Step lightly: All-optical transistor triggered by single photon promises advances in quantum applications
The unifying framework of symmetry reveals properties of a broad range of physical systems
What time is it in the universe?

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Feynman diagrams and relativistic propagators Quantum Physics 0
Feynman Propagators High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 2
Feynman trick for linear propagators? High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 1
MWI and Born Rule Quantum Physics 69
Why the Born Rule? Quantum Physics 5