Proving Similar Matrices Have the Same Characteristic Polynomial

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that two nxn matrices, A and B, defined by the relation A = QBQ' for an invertible matrix Q, share the same characteristic polynomial. The key steps involve demonstrating that det(A - I*lambda) equals det(B - I*lambda) by manipulating the determinant expressions. The participant successfully applies the properties of determinants, specifically det(ABC) = det(A)det(B)det(C), and the identity AI = IA, to establish the equality. This proof is crucial for understanding the relationship between similar matrices and their characteristic polynomials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix theory, specifically the properties of determinants.
  • Familiarity with the concept of similar matrices and their implications.
  • Knowledge of linear algebra notation, including characteristic polynomials.
  • Proficiency in matrix multiplication and its properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of determinants in depth, focusing on the multiplicative property.
  • Explore the concept of similar matrices and their applications in linear algebra.
  • Learn about characteristic polynomials and their significance in eigenvalue problems.
  • Investigate the implications of matrix similarity in various mathematical contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians interested in matrix theory, and anyone studying eigenvalues and characteristic polynomials will benefit from this discussion.

EvLer
Messages
454
Reaction score
0
So, I have stared at this for a while:
Notation: Q' - inverse of Q, != stands for "not equal";

Suppose A and B are nxn matrices such that A = QBQ' for some invertible matrix Q. Prove that A and B have the same characteristic polynomials

I can prove that they have the same determinant, but that is about it. I know that charact. polyn. looks like so:

det(A - I*lambda) = det(B - I*lambda)
det(QBQ' - I*lamda) = det(B - I*lambda)

It would be equal if Q and Q' cancel out, but isn't it true that det(A + B) != det(A) + det(B).
I am not sure where to go from here. Is it correct to multiply expressions inside parenthesis by something on both sides? even if it's in determinant :rolleyes:
I am studying for the final, so any help is appreciated more than ever.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
det(QBQ' - kI) = det(QBQ' - Q(kI)Q'), where I'm using k instead of [itex]\lambda[/itex] because it's easier to type. Now, do you see why this equality holds?

Q(kI)Q' = kQIQ' = k(QI)Q' = k(Q)Q' = kQQ' = k(I) = kI, so the equality does hold. Use the distributive property of matrix multiplaction twice, then use the fact that det(ABC) = det(A)det(B)det(C), and you should be done.
 
Ohhh, OK. So you also used this identity: AI = IA.
Thanks :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K