## Last line integral problem (hopefully)

Greetings again,

Show that for F(x,y)=<2xy-3, x^(2)+4y^(3)+5> the line integral F(x,y).dr is independant of path. Then evaluate the line integral for any curve C with initial point (-1,2) and the terminal point (2,3).

Thanks again, you all have been very helpful.

 PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com >> 'Whodunnit' of Irish potato famine solved>> The mammoth's lament: Study shows how cosmic impact sparked devastating climate change>> Curiosity Mars rover drills second rock target
 has your class covered exact differentials?
 i don't believe so unless its known by another name?

## Last line integral problem (hopefully)

I'll post a detailed explanation tomorrow (if no one else has by then). I doubt you would know the subject by a different name.

 A line integral is independent of path if there exists a function U, that Fdr is it's exact (total) differential. In this case U=x^2y-3x+5y+y^4. dU=(2xy-3)dx+(x^2+4y^3+5)dy=Fdr.
 Recognitions: Gold Member Science Advisor Staff Emeritus An "exact differential" fdx+ gdy (a physics major may prefer to think of it as a "conservative force field") is, as Oggy said, one such that there exist a function U such that dU= fdx+ gdy. By the "chain rule", $$dU= \frac{\partial U}{\partial x}dx+ \frac{\partial U}{/partial y}$$ so we must have $$f= \frac{\partial U}{/partial x}$$ and [tex]g= \frac{\partial U}{/partial g}. A quick way to test that is to use the "cross derivative test: If the second partials are continuous, that requires that [tex]\frac{\partial f}{/partial y}= U_{xy}= U_{yx}= \frac{\partial g}{\partial x}[/itex].